The state of cumulative sum sequential changepoint testing 70 years after Page

被引:14
作者
Aue, Alexander [1 ]
Kirch, Claudia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Stat, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Dept Math, Univ Pl 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
Changepoint analysis; Cumulative sum; Monitoring procedure; Sequential testing; CHANGE-POINT DETECTION; TIME-SERIES; MONITORING CHANGES; PARAMETER CHANGE; DELAY-TIME;
D O I
10.1093/biomet/asad079
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Quality control charts aim at raising an alarm as soon as sequentially obtained observations of an underlying random process no longer seem to be within stochastic fluctuations prescribed by an in-control scenario. Such random processes can often be modelled using the concept of stationarity, or even independence as in most classical works. An important out-of-control scenario is the changepoint alternative, for which the distribution of the process changes at an unknown point in time. In his seminal 1954 Biometrika paper, E. S. Page introduced the famous cumulative sum control charts for changepoint monitoring. Innovatively, decision rules based on cumulative sum procedures took the full history of the process into account, whereas previous procedures were based only on a fixed and typically small number of the most recent observations. The extreme case of using only the most recent observation, often referred to as the Shewhart chart, is more akin to serial outlier than changepoint detection. Page's cumulative sum approach, introduced seven decades ago, is ubiquitous in modern changepoint analysis, and his original paper has led to a multitude of follow-up papers in different research communities. This review is focused on a particular subfield of this research, namely nonparametric sequential, or online, changepoint tests that are constructed to maintain a desired Type-1 error as opposed to the more traditional approach seeking to minimize the average run length of the procedures. Such tests have originated at the intersection of econometrics and statistics. We trace the development of these tests and highlight their properties, mostly using a simple location model for clarity of exposition, but we also review more complex situations such as regression and time series models.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 391
页数:25
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   High dimensional efficiency with applications to change point tests [J].
Aston, John A. D. ;
Kirch, Claudia .
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2018, 12 (01) :1901-1947
[2]   Delay time in sequential detection of change [J].
Aue, A ;
Horváth, L .
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2004, 67 (03) :221-231
[3]   Change-point monitoring in linear models [J].
Aue, Alexander ;
Horvath, Lajos ;
Huskova, Marie ;
Kokoszka, Piotr .
ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL, 2006, 9 (03) :373-403
[4]   Reaction times of monitoring schemes for ARMA time series [J].
Aue, Alexander ;
Dienes, Christopher ;
Fremdt, Stefan ;
Steinebach, Josef .
BERNOULLI, 2015, 21 (02) :1238-1259
[5]   DEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL LINEAR MODELS WITH APPLICATIONS TO MONITORING STRUCTURAL CHANGE [J].
Aue, Alexander ;
Hormann, Siegfried ;
Horvath, Lajos ;
Huskova, Marie .
STATISTICA SINICA, 2014, 24 (03) :1043-1073
[6]   Structural breaks in time series [J].
Aue, Alexander ;
Horvath, Lajos .
JOURNAL OF TIME SERIES ANALYSIS, 2013, 34 (01) :1-16
[7]   SEQUENTIAL TESTING FOR THE STABILITY OF HIGH-FREQUENCY PORTFOLIO BETAS [J].
Aue, Alexander ;
Hormann, Siegfried ;
Horvath, Lajos ;
Huskova, Marie ;
Steinebach, Josef G. .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2012, 28 (04) :804-837
[8]   On the reaction time of moving sum detectors [J].
Aue, Alexander ;
Horvath, Lajos ;
Kuehn, Mario ;
Steinebach, Josef .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2012, 142 (08) :2271-2288
[9]   Extreme value distribution of a recursive-type detector in a linear model [J].
Aue, Alexander ;
Kuehn, Mario .
EXTREMES, 2008, 11 (02) :135-166
[10]   Delay times of sequential procedures for multiple time series regression models [J].
Aue, Alexander ;
Horvath, Lajos ;
Reimherr, Matthew L. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2009, 149 (02) :174-190