Expectation violations produce error signals in mouse V1

被引:3
|
作者
Price, Byron H. [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Cambria M. [1 ]
Khoudary, Anthony A. [1 ]
Gavornik, Jeffrey P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Ctr Syst Neurosci, Dept Biol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Grad Program Neurosci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
primary visual cortex; prediction errors; plasticity; statistical modeling; VISUAL RECOGNITION MEMORY; NATURAL SCENES; SENSORIMOTOR; CORTEX; EXPERIENCE; INFORMATION; PREDICTION; REPRESENTATIONS; STATISTICS; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhad163
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Repeated exposure to visual sequences changes the form of evoked activity in the primary visual cortex (V1). Predictive coding theory provides a potential explanation for this, namely that plasticity shapes cortical circuits to encode spatiotemporal predictions and that subsequent responses are modulated by the degree to which actual inputs match these expectations. Here we use a recently developed statistical modeling technique called Model-Based Targeted Dimensionality Reduction (MbTDR) to study visually evoked dynamics in mouse V1 in the context of an experimental paradigm called "sequence learning." We report that evoked spiking activity changed significantly with training, in a manner generally consistent with the predictive coding framework. Neural responses to expected stimuli were suppressed in a late window (100-150 ms) after stimulus onset following training, whereas responses to novel stimuli were not. Substituting a novel stimulus for a familiar one led to increases in firing that persisted for at least 300 ms. Omitting predictable stimuli in trained animals also led to increased firing at the expected time of stimulus onset. Finally, we show that spiking data can be used to accurately decode time within the sequence. Our findings are consistent with the idea that plasticity in early visual circuits is involved in coding spatiotemporal information.
引用
收藏
页码:8803 / 8820
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Recognition Memory across All Layers of Mouse V1
    Hayden, Dustin J.
    Finnie, Peter S. B.
    Thomazeau, Aurore
    Li, Alyssa Y.
    Cooke, Samuel F.
    Bear, Mark F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 43 (44) : 7307 - 7321
  • [2] V1 microcircuits underlying mouse visual behavior
    Katzner, Steffen
    Born, Gregory
    Busse, Laura
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2019, 58 : 191 - 198
  • [3] Mixing of Chromatic and Luminance Retinal Signals in Primate Area V1
    Li, Xiaobing
    Chen, Yao
    Lashgari, Reza
    Bereshpolova, Yulia
    Swadlow, Harvey A.
    Lee, Barry B.
    Alonso, Jose Manuel
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2015, 25 (07) : 1920 - 1937
  • [4] Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1
    Dadarlat, Maria C.
    Stryker, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 37 (14) : 3764 - 3775
  • [5] Emergence of visually-evoked reward expectation signals in dopamine neurons via the superior colliculus in V1 lesioned monkeys
    Takakuwa, Norihiro
    Kato, Rikako
    Redgrave, Peter
    Isa, Tadashi
    ELIFE, 2017, 6
  • [6] Selectivity, hyperselectivity, and the tuning of V1 neurons
    Vilankar, Kedarnath P.
    Field, David J.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2017, 17 (09):
  • [7] Dynamic communication of attention signals between the LGN and V1
    Mock, Vanessa L.
    Luke, Kimberly L.
    Hembrook-Short, Jacqueline R.
    Briggs, Farran
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 120 (04) : 1625 - 1639
  • [8] Visual Crowding in V1
    Millin, Rachel
    Arman, A. Cyrus
    Chung, Susana T. L.
    Tjan, Bosco S.
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2014, 24 (12) : 3107 - 3115
  • [9] TMS applied to V1 can facilitate reasoning
    Hamburger, Kai
    Ragni, Marco
    Karimpur, Harun
    Franzmeier, Imke
    Wedell, Florian
    Knauff, Markus
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 236 (08) : 2277 - 2286
  • [10] Nonuniform surround suppression of visual responses in mouse V1
    Samonds, Jason M.
    Feese, Berquin D.
    Lee, Tai Sing
    Kuhlman, Sandra J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 118 (06) : 3282 - 3292