Repeatability of Open-MOLLI: An open-source inversion recovery myocardial T1 mapping sequence for fast prototyping

被引:2
作者
Gaspar, Andreia S. [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Silva, Nuno A. [3 ]
Ferreira, Antonio M. [4 ,5 ]
Nunes, Rita G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Sistemas & Robot Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Dept Bioengn, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Luz Saude, Hosp Luz Learning Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Ocidental, Hosp Santa Cruz, Serv Cardiol, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Hosp Luz, Unidade Imagiol Cardiaca Avancada, Lisbon, Portugal
[6] Univ Lisbon, Inst Sistemas & Robot Lisboa, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[7] Univ Lisbon, Dept Bioengn, Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
cardiac MRI; open-source; Pulseq; repeatability; T1; mapping; PULSE SEQUENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; ACCURACY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.30080
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop an open-source prototype of myocardial T1 mapping (Open-MOLLI) to improve accessibility to cardiac T1 mapping and evaluate its repeatability. With Open-MOLLI, we aim to enable faster implementation and testing of sequence modifications and to facilitate inter-scanner and cross-vendor reproducibility studies. Methods: Open-MOLLI is an inversion-recovery sequence using a balanced SSFP (bSSFP) readout, with inversion and triggering schemes based on the 5(3)3 MOLLI sequence, developed in Pulseq. Open-MOLLI and MOLLI sequences were acquired in the ISMRM/NIST phantom and 21 healthy volunteers. In 18 of those subjects, Open-MOLLI and MOLLI were repeated in the same session (test-retest). Results: Phantom T1 values were comparable between methods, specifically for the vial with reference T1 value most similar to healthy myocardium T1 (T1(vial3) = 1027 ms): T1(MOLLI) = 1011 +/- 24 ms versus T1(Open-MOLLI) = 1009 +/- 20 ms. In vivo T1 estimates were similar between Open-MOLLI and MOLLI (T1(MOLLI) = 1004 +/- 33 ms vs. T1(Open-MOLLI) = 998 +/- 52 ms), with a mean difference of -17 ms (p = 0.20), despite noisier Open-MOLLI weighted images and maps. Repeatability measures were slightly higher for Open-MOLLI (RCMOLLI = 3.0% vs. RCOpen-MOLLI = 4.4%). Conclusion: The open-source sequence Open-MOLLI can be used for T1 mapping in vivo with similar mean T1 values to the MOLLI method. Open-MOLLI increases the accessibility to cardiac T1 mapping, providing also a base sequence to which further improvements can easily be added and tested.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 750
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Ravi K., 2019, Joss, V4, P1725, DOI DOI 10.21105/JOSS.01725
  • [22] Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility of Four T1 Mapping Sequences: A Head-to-Head Comparison of MOLLI, ShMOLLI, SASHA, and SAPPHIRE
    Roujol, Sebastien
    Weingaertner, Sebastian
    Foppa, Murilo
    Chow, Kelvin
    Kawaji, Keigo
    Ngo, Long H.
    Kellman, Peter
    Manning, Warren J.
    Thompson, Richard B.
    Nezafat, Reza
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 272 (03) : 683 - 689
  • [23] A standard system phantom for magnetic resonance imaging
    Stupic, Karl F.
    Ainslie, Maureen
    Boss, Michael A.
    Charles, Cecil
    Dienstfrey, Andrew M.
    Evelhoch, Jeffrey L.
    Finn, Paul
    Gimbutas, Zydrunas
    Gunter, Jeffrey L.
    Hill, Derek L. G.
    Jack, Clifford R.
    Jackson, Edward F.
    Karaulanov, Todor
    Keenan, Kathryn E.
    Liu, Guoying
    Martin, Michele N.
    Prasad, Pottumarthi, V
    Rentz, Nikki S.
    Yuan, Chun
    Russek, Stephen E.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 86 (03) : 1194 - 1211
  • [24] Controlled saturation magnetization transfer for reproducible multivendor variable flip angle T1 and T2 mapping
    Teixeira, Rui Pedro A. G.
    Neji, Radhouene
    Wood, Tobias C.
    Baburamani, Ana A.
    Malik, Shaihan J.
    Hajnal, Joseph V.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 84 (01) : 221 - 236
  • [25] A framework for validating open-source pulse sequences
    Tong, Gehua
    Gaspar, Andreia S.
    Qian, Enlin
    Ravi, Keerthi Sravan
    Vaughan, John Thomas, Jr.
    Nunes, Rita G.
    Geethanath, Sairam
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 87 : 7 - 18
  • [26] Open-Source MR Imaging and Reconstruction Workflow
    Veldmann, Marten
    Ehses, Philipp
    Chow, Kelvin
    Nielsen, Jon-Fredrik
    Zaitsev, Maxim
    Stoecker, Tony
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2022, 88 (06) : 2395 - 2407
  • [27] Development, validation, qualification, and dissemination of quantitative MR methods: Overview and recommendations by the ISMRM quantitative MR study group
    Weingartner, Sebastian
    Desmond, Kimberly L.
    Obuchowski, Nancy A.
    Baessler, Bettina
    Zhang, Yuxin
    Biondetti, Emma
    Ma, Dan
    Golay, Xavier
    Boss, Michael A.
    Gunter, Jeffrey L.
    Keenan, Kathryn E.
    Hernando, Diego
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2022, 87 (03) : 1184 - 1206
  • [28] Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery for Myocardial T1 Mapping with Motion Correction and Parametric Fitting
    Xue, Hui
    Greiser, Andreas
    Zuehlsdorff, Sven
    Jolly, Marie-Pierre
    Guehring, Jens
    Arai, Andrew E.
    Kellman, Peter
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 69 (05) : 1408 - 1420
  • [29] Ye S., 2022, BJR OPEN, V4