THE IMPACT OF INQUIRY-BASED ONLINE LEARNING WITH VIRTUAL LABORATORIES ON STUDENTS' SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILLS

被引:0
作者
Hendratmoko, Ahmad Fauzi [1 ]
Madlazim, Madlazim [1 ]
Widodo, Wahono [1 ]
Sanjaya, I. Gusti Made [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Negeri Surabaya, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Surabaya, Indonesia
关键词
Scientific argumentation skills; online learning; inquiry-based online learning; virtual laboratory; WRITTEN ARGUMENTS; CRITICAL THINKING; SCIENCE; PARTICIPATE; ISSUES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Scientific argumentation is a higher-order thinking skill that is a major focus in education in the 21st century. This is a skill that plays an important role in knowledge construction which in reality is rarely implemented in science learning. The facts show that most students have low scientific argumentation skills and still need to be improved. In improving scientific argumentation skills, the learning design used must give students more opportunities to build and criticize arguments, make claims, and use evidence in the process of reasoning based on inquiry activities. Based on the results of previous research, it is known that inquiry-based learning has extraordinary potential in developing students' scientific argumentation skills. Interestingly, no research has been found that reveals the effect of inquiry-based online learning on students' scientific argumentation skills. Therefore, this study aims to determine the impact of inquiry-based online learning with a virtual laboratory on students' scientific argumentation skills. This study uses a one group pretest-posttest design with n-gain analysis. The results of this study indicate that the application of inquiry-based online learning with a virtual laboratory can improve students' scientific argumentation skills. Uniquely, this only significantly impacts the claim, evidence, and reasoning components, but not the counterclaim and rebuttal components.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   Sampling: Why and How of it? [J].
Acharya, Anita S. ;
Prakash, Anupam ;
Saxena, Pikee ;
Nigam, Aruna .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SPECIALITIES, 2013, 4 (02) :330-333
[2]  
Admoko S., 2021, Advances in Engineering Research, V209, P502
[3]  
Adnan M., 2020, J PEDAGOGICAL SOCIOL, V2, P45, DOI DOI 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
[4]  
Akili A. W. R., 2022, Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, V16, P22, DOI [10.15294/jipk, DOI 10.15294/JIPK]
[5]  
Al Giffari F., 2021, FACTUM: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Pendidikan Sejarah, V9, P203, DOI [10.17509/factum.v9i2.27813, DOI 10.17509/FACTUM.V9I2.27813]
[6]   The next time around: scaffolding and shifts in argumentation in initial and subsequent implementations of inquiry-oriented instructional materials [J].
Andrews-Larson, Christine ;
McCrackin, Shelby ;
Kasper, Valerie .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BEHAVIOR, 2019, 56
[7]   Exploring high school student's argumentation structure through ecology: a case study [J].
Anisa, A. ;
Widodo, A. ;
Riandi, R. ;
Muslim, M. .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE EDUCATION (ICMSCE 2018), 2019, 1157
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Analyzing Change/Gain Scores
[9]   Using formative assessment to promote argumentation in a university bilingual science course [J].
Archila, Pablo Antonio ;
Molina, Jorge ;
Truscott de Mejia, Anne-Marie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2018, 40 (13) :1669-1695
[10]  
Arends R., 2012, Learning to teach