Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in attenuating pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation under bispectral index controlled anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blinded study

被引:5
作者
Jain, Kavita [1 ]
Sethi, Surendra Kumar [2 ]
Harsha, K. N. [1 ]
Patodi, Veena [1 ]
Jain, Neena [1 ]
Meena, Deepika [1 ]
机构
[1] JLN Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
[2] RNT Med Coll & Associated Grp Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Bispectral index; Dexmedetomidine; Endotracheal intubation; Hemodynamic pressor response; Laryngoscopy; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1186/s42077-023-00314-w
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation may lead to a remarkable hemodynamic pressor response. Dexmedetomidine, an a(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist, can be effectively used to attenuate this pressor effect. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of two different doses of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mu g/kg and 1.0 mu g/kg) in attenuation of hemodynamic pressor response to largyngoscopy and endotracheal intubation under bispectral index (BIS) monitoring. One hundred twenty adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II posted for various elective surgeries under general anesthesia were enrolled to receive an intravenous (IV) infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mu g/kg (group D1; n = 40), 1.0 mu g/kg (group D2; n = 40) or normal saline over 15 min (group C; n = 40). The primary outcome measure was to assess the hemodynamic changes while the secondary outcome measures were to assess sedation, dose of propofol required for induction and side effects. Results The mean HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP remained significantly lower in both dexmedetomidine groups as compared to control group after study drug infusion, after induction, at and after intubation (P < 0.05). Group D2 also had significantly lower mean HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP in comparison to group D1 (P < 0.05). The induction dose of propofol was significantly less in dexmedetomidine groups as compared to control group (P < 0.05). Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) score was found to be significantly more in both groups D1 and D2 after study drug infusion (P<0.001). No significant difference was noted in incidence of side effects (P = 0.907). Conclusions Dexmedetomidine (0.5 mu g/kg and 1.0 mu g/kg) was found to be effective in attenuating the hemodynamic pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with BIS monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of different doses of esmolol on hemodynamic, bispectral index and movement response during orotracheal intubation: prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Cakirgoz, Mensure Yilmaz
    Tasdogen, Aydin
    Olguner, Cimen
    Korkmaz, Hulya
    Ogun, Ertugrul
    Kucukebe, Burak
    Duran, Esra
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2014, 64 (06): : 425 - 432
  • [42] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine for prevention of emergence agitation in patients posted for nasal surgery under desflurane anaesthesia: A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
    Garg, Akaansha
    Kamal, Manoj
    Mohammed, Sadik
    Singariya, Geeta
    Chouhan, Dilip S.
    Biyani, Ghanshyam
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (07) : 524 - 530
  • [43] Comparison Between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam-Fentanyl Combination in Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Study
    Magazine, Rahul
    Elenjickal, Vrinda Mariya
    Padukone, Ambika M.
    Bhat, Anup
    Chogtu, Bharti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04)
  • [44] Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl added to bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in combination with general anesthesia for elective lumbar disc operations: A prospective, randomized double-blinded study
    Alansary, Amin Mohammed
    Elbeialy, Marwa Ahmed Khairy
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 13 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [45] DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN EMERGENCY HAND SURGERY AS AN ADJUVANT TO ROPIVACAINE-INDUCED SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK: A PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLINDED AND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
    Mandal, Sudipta Kumar
    Das, Koyel
    Das, Anjan
    Basak, Subhadeep
    Bisai, Subrata
    Bhattacharya, Saptarshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (98): : 16320 - 16325
  • [46] Effect of mini-dose epidural dexmedetomidine in elective cesarean section using combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a randomized double-blinded controlled study
    Ayman Abdelmaksoud Yousef
    Hesham Abdalaziz Salem
    Mostafa Zein Moustafa
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2015, 29 : 708 - 714
  • [47] Dexmetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of the hemodynamic effects of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    M Mavri
    K Rellos
    I Pantazopoulos
    C Kampolis
    I Floros
    N Iacovidou
    T Xanthos
    C Pantazopoulos
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 3 (Suppl 1)
  • [48] Which is the better adjuvant to ropivacaine in brachial plexus block: dexmedetomidine or morphine? A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, comparative study
    Wang, Xiaocou
    Yu, Fan
    Li, Kezhong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (07): : 10813 - 10819
  • [49] The effects of caudal or intravenous dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia produced by caudal bupivacaine in children: a A randomized controlled double-blinded study
    Al-Zaben, Khaled R.
    Qudaisat, Ibraheem Y.
    Alja'bari, Aboud N.
    Ababneh, Omar A.
    Yousef, Al-Motassem M.
    Al-Shudifat, Abdulrahman M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 33 : 386 - 394
  • [50] Pain relief after Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A comparison of intra-articular ropivacaine, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study
    Manuar, Mohammed Babrak
    Majumdar, Saikat
    Das, Anjan
    Hajra, Bimal Kumar
    Dutta, Soumyadip
    Mukherjee, Dipankar
    Mitra, Tapobrata
    Kundu, Ratul
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 8 (02) : 233 - 237