Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in attenuating pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation under bispectral index controlled anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blinded study

被引:5
|
作者
Jain, Kavita [1 ]
Sethi, Surendra Kumar [2 ]
Harsha, K. N. [1 ]
Patodi, Veena [1 ]
Jain, Neena [1 ]
Meena, Deepika [1 ]
机构
[1] JLN Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
[2] RNT Med Coll & Associated Grp Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Bispectral index; Dexmedetomidine; Endotracheal intubation; Hemodynamic pressor response; Laryngoscopy; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1186/s42077-023-00314-w
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation may lead to a remarkable hemodynamic pressor response. Dexmedetomidine, an a(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist, can be effectively used to attenuate this pressor effect. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of two different doses of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mu g/kg and 1.0 mu g/kg) in attenuation of hemodynamic pressor response to largyngoscopy and endotracheal intubation under bispectral index (BIS) monitoring. One hundred twenty adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II posted for various elective surgeries under general anesthesia were enrolled to receive an intravenous (IV) infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mu g/kg (group D1; n = 40), 1.0 mu g/kg (group D2; n = 40) or normal saline over 15 min (group C; n = 40). The primary outcome measure was to assess the hemodynamic changes while the secondary outcome measures were to assess sedation, dose of propofol required for induction and side effects. Results The mean HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP remained significantly lower in both dexmedetomidine groups as compared to control group after study drug infusion, after induction, at and after intubation (P < 0.05). Group D2 also had significantly lower mean HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP in comparison to group D1 (P < 0.05). The induction dose of propofol was significantly less in dexmedetomidine groups as compared to control group (P < 0.05). Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) score was found to be significantly more in both groups D1 and D2 after study drug infusion (P<0.001). No significant difference was noted in incidence of side effects (P = 0.907). Conclusions Dexmedetomidine (0.5 mu g/kg and 1.0 mu g/kg) was found to be effective in attenuating the hemodynamic pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with BIS monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in attenuating pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation under bispectral index controlled anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blinded study
    Kavita Jain
    Surendra Kumar Sethi
    Harsha K.N.
    Veena Patodi
    Neena Jain
    Deepika Meena
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 15
  • [2] Attenuation of the pressor responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with intravenous dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate under bispectral index-controlled anaesthesia: A placebo-controlled prospective randomised trial
    Mahajan, Lakshmi
    Kaur, Manjot
    Gupta, Ruch
    Aujla, Kuljeet Singh
    Singh, Avtar
    Kaur, Ashreen
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (05) : 337 - 343
  • [3] Comparison of the efficacy of two doses of dexmedetomidine in attenuating the hemodynamic response to intubation in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: A randomized double-blinded study
    Silpa, Annedath R.
    Koshy, K. A.
    Subramanian, Arun
    Pradeep, Kizakke K.
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 36 (01) : 83 - 87
  • [4] Effect of Preoperative Intravenous and Inhalational Dexmedetomidine on the Hemodynamic Response of Laryngoscopy: A Prospective Double-blinded Randomized Study
    Singh, Shivanya
    Gupta, Priyanka
    Dhar, Mridul
    Pasha, Arhan
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2023, 12 (04) : 123 - 129
  • [5] The effect of Dexmedetomidine on suppression of the bispectral index score and hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and intubation in addicted patients in supratentorial brain tumor surgery, a randomized double-blinded controlled trial
    Asgari, Sogol
    Behnaz, Faranak
    Ommi, Davood
    Zandpazandi, Sara
    Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi
    TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 53
  • [6] Comparison of the Magnesium Sulphate With Paracetamol Combination vs the Fentanyl With Lignocaine Combination in Attenuating the Hemodynamic Response During Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective, Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
    Murugesan, Nandhakumar
    Kamalnath, Amoolya
    Ranjan, R., V
    Segaran, Sivakumar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [7] Effect of low-dose ketamine versus fentanyl on attenuating the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
    Ongewe, Angela
    Mung'ayi, Vitalis
    Bal, Rajpreet
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 19 (03) : 2752 - 2763
  • [8] Nebulised fentanyl, dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate for attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: A double-blinded, randomised comparative study
    Grover, Niharika
    Taneja, Rashmi
    Rashid, Yawar
    Shrivastava, Neha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 67 (08) : 730 - 735
  • [9] Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Attenuating Haemodynamic and Blood Glucose Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Single Blinded Study
    Koh, Vincent
    Ali, Saedah
    Hassan, Mohamad Hasyizan
    Mokhtar, Ariffin Marzuki
    Yaacob, Mohd Najib Majdi
    Mazlan, Mohd Zulfakar
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (03): : 46 - 55
  • [10] Attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with single dose dexmedetomidine in controlled hypertensive patients: prospective randomized double-blind study
    Ismail, Eman Ahmed
    Mostafa, Ahmed Abdelrahman
    Abdelatif, Mohamed M.
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)