The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review

被引:5
作者
Slovak, Lubos [1 ,2 ]
Danek, Jan [1 ,3 ]
Danek, Tomas [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Dept Environm Studies, Brno, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Humanities, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Palacky Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Dev & Environm Studies, Olomouc, Czech Republic
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; VALUES; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; INTERVIEWS; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-023-01530-3
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Focus groups are an increasingly popular method for eliciting non-material values and cultural ecosystem services (CES) in the context of studying human-nature relationships. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the aim of exploring where and how focus groups were used in the research into CES. Furthermore, we aimed to highlight good practices and potential caveats of the use of the focus groups method with respect to recommendations in methodological literature. We employed an inclusive CES classification framework and observed that focus groups were mostly used to research Recreation, Aesthetics, and Education categories. The review also discovered insufficient reporting and methodological inconsistencies in some of the studies. We provide suggestions for more robust and trustworthy applications of the focus group method, which can advance both research in this field and the implementation of the ecosystem services concept in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages [J].
Acocella, Ivana .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2012, 46 (04) :1125-1136
[2]   Identification, Prioritization and Mapping of Ecosystem Services in the Panchase Mountain Ecological Region of Western Nepal [J].
Adhikari, Shankar ;
Baral, Himlal ;
Nitschke, Craig R. .
FORESTS, 2018, 9 (09)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis
[4]   Involving Forest Communities in Identifying and Constructing Ecosystem Services: Millennium Assessment and Place Specificity [J].
Asah, Stanley T. ;
Blahna, Dale J. ;
Ryan, Clare M. .
JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2012, 110 (03) :149-156
[5]  
Barbour R., 2018, DOING FOCUS GROUPS
[6]   Shades of grey challenge practical application of the cultural ecosystem services concept [J].
Blicharska, Malgorzata ;
Smithers, Richard J. ;
Hedblom, Marcus ;
Hedenas, Henrik ;
Mikusinski, Grzegorz ;
Pedersen, Eja ;
Sandstrom, Per ;
Svensson, Johan .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 23 :55-70
[7]  
Bloor M., 2001, FOCUS GROUPS SOCIAL, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781849209175
[8]   Conservation in the face of ambivalent public perceptions - The case of peatlands as 'the good, the bad and the ugly' [J].
Byg, Anja ;
Martin-Ortega, Julia ;
Glenk, Klaus ;
Novo, Paula .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 206 :181-189
[9]   Incorporating basic needs to reconcile poverty and ecosystem services [J].
Chaigneau, Tomas ;
Coulthard, Sarah ;
Brown, Katrina ;
Daw, Tim M. ;
Schulte-Herbruggen, Bjorn .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (03) :655-664
[10]   Examining linkages between ecosystem services and social wellbeing to improve governance for coastal conservation in Jamaica [J].
Chan, Cheryl ;
Armitage, Derek ;
Alexander, Steven M. ;
Campbell, Donovan .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39