An empirical investigation of productivity dynamics and determinants of total factor productivity in selected manufacturing sectors: a panel data analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Kaur, Puneet Prakash [1 ]
Kiran, Ravi [1 ]
机构
[1] Thapar Inst Engn & Technol, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Patiala 147004, Punjab, India
来源
CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE | 2023年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
Market Concentration; Total factor Productivity; Indian Manufacturing Industries; Panel data Analysis; Capital Intensity; UNITED-STATES; GROWTH; US; COMPETITION; INDUSTRIES; SLOWDOWN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The present research is an effort to determine which factors influence total factor productivity (TFP) in selected sectors, viz. motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers#29; chemicals & chemical products#20; food products#10; tobacco and tobacco products#12. Using Translog index for TFP, it gives a complete picture better than atrial productivities. Panel data analysis was applied to determine the relation between TFP and its determinants. The determinants include capital intensity; credit; rate of growth of output, technology status, total emoluments and concentration ratio. Total factor productivity was low during the period 2006-2017. Results of 4-firm concentration ratio, highlighted moderate concentration for high-technology sector, viz. in automobile and chemicals & chemical products. Food Product sector had lowest concentration ratio, while Tobacco & Tobacco products was the most concentrated industry. Capital intensity; technology status, total emoluments and market concentration emerged as significant factors influencing TFP. The fixed model explained 68.18 percent of variation in TFP. These results highlight that TFP is influenced by capital intensity and technology status & market concentration. Earlier studies highlight the importance of total emoluments also. As we can say the fourth industrial revolution focuses on technology factors and market concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 86
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Heterogeneous Are the Determinants of Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing Sectors? Panel-Data Evidence from Vietnam
    Quang-Thanh Ngo
    Quang-Van Tran
    Tien-Dung Nguyen
    Trung-Thanh Nguyen
    ECONOMIES, 2020, 8 (03)
  • [2] What explains Total Factor Productivity in agriculture: An empirical investigation using panel data analysis
    Koc, Ahmet Ali
    Ozdamar, Oznur
    Uysal, Peyman
    NEW MEDIT, 2023, 23 (02): : 81 - 102
  • [3] The Determinants of Total Factor Productivity in Polish Subregions. Panel Data Analysis
    Danska-Borsiak, Barbara
    Laskowska, Iwona
    COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC RESEARCH-CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, 2012, 15 (04): : 17 - 29
  • [4] An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Total Factor Productivity on Manufacturing Performance
    Zhang, Hongbo
    Wu, Jianyuan
    Zhong, Nian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING, SIMULATION AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS (MSAM 2018), 2018, 160 : 273 - 276
  • [5] Factor Determinants of Total Factor Productivity Growth in Malaysian Manufacturing Industries: a decomposition analysis
    Kim, Sangho
    Shafi'i, Mazlina
    ASIAN-PACIFIC ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2009, 23 (01) : 48 - 65
  • [6] FACTOR DETERMINANTS OF TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH FOR THE JAPANESE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
    Kim, Sangho
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 34 (03) : 572 - 586
  • [7] Determinants of total factor productivity growth of Tunisian manufacturing firms
    Thabet, Khaled
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2018, 38 (01): : 336 - +
  • [8] DETERMINANTS OF TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY
    FABRYCY, MZ
    WESTERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1971, 9 (04): : 408 - 418
  • [9] The panel threshold analysis of digitalization on manufacturing industry's green total factor productivity
    Liu, Lu
    Xin, Yulong
    Liu, Bei
    Pang, Yuankui
    Kong, Weiran
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [10] Determinants of productivity per employee: An empirical estimation using panel data
    Belorgey, Nicolas
    Lecat, Remy
    Maury, Tristan-Pierre
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2006, 91 (02) : 153 - 157