Optimizing Step-Size of Perturb & Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Techniques Using PSO for Grid-Tied PV System

被引:77
作者
Ibrahim, Mohammad Haziq [1 ]
Ang, Swee Peng [1 ]
Dani, Muhammad Norfauzi [1 ]
Rahman, Mohammad Ishlah [2 ]
Petra, Rafidah [1 ]
Sulthan, Sheik Mohammed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Brunei, Fac Engn, Elect & Elect Engn Programme Area, Gadong BE1410, Brunei
[2] Politekn Brunei, Minist Educ, Sch Sci & Engn, Bandar Seri Begawan BA1311, Brunei
关键词
Power generation; Oscillators; Optimization; Maximum power point trackers; Particle swarm optimization; Heuristic algorithms; Voltage measurement; Hybrid MPPT; particle swarm optimization; incremental conductance; perturb and observe; optimal step-size; single-stage grid connected PV system; POWER POINT TRACKING; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM; ALGORITHM; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3242979
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique plays an important role to ensure maximum photovoltaic (PV) output power is extracted under stochastic weather conditions. The research to date tends to focus on developing a standalone optimization MPPT algorithm rather than looking into a hybrid MPPT algorithm. This paper introduces particle swarm optimization (PSO) to optimize the maximum PV output power and to determine the best design variable for penalizing the step size of the conventional methods namely the perturb and observe (PO) and the incremental conductance (IC). With the help of the hybrid MPPT algorithm (PSO+IC and PSO+PO), the step size is no longer fixed, and it is changing according to the solar irradiance. To evaluate the proposed hybrid algorithm, a single-stage grid connected PV system is designed for several different scenarios with various weather conditions. The performance of the hybrid MPPT algorithm and the conventional methods is compared. The results demonstrate that the hybrid MPPT algorithm is remarkably better than the conventional methods, especially for PSO+IC, where it only takes 43.4 ms of tracking time and reaches the efficiency of 99.07% under standard test conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:13079 / 13090
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Abdel-Basset M., 2018, COMPUTATIONAL INTELL, P185, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-813314-9.00010-4, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-813314-9.00010-4, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-813314-9.00010-4.Z.B.T.-C.I]
[2]   An improved perturb and observe (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm for higher efficiency [J].
Ahmed, Jubaer ;
Salam, Zainal .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 150 :97-108
[3]   Modified efficient perturb and observe maximum power point tracking technique for grid-tied PV system [J].
Ali, Ahmed I. M. ;
Sayed, Mahmoud A. ;
Mohamed, Essam E. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2018, 99 :192-202
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, MATLAB, Version R2022a
[5]   Steady Output and Fast Tracking MPPT (SOFT-MPPT) for P&O and InC Algorithms [J].
Bhattacharyya, Shamik ;
Kumar, Dattu Sampath P. ;
Samanta, Susovon ;
Mishra, Sukumar .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2021, 12 (01) :293-302
[6]   Overview of control and grid synchronization for distributed power generation systems [J].
Blaabjerg, Frede ;
Teodorescu, Remus ;
Liserre, Marco ;
Timbus, Adrian V. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2006, 53 (05) :1398-1409
[7]   Annual performance analysis of different maximum power point tracking techniques used in photovoltaic systems [J].
Chaibi, Y. ;
Allouhi, A. ;
Salhi, M. ;
El-jouni, A. .
PROTECTION AND CONTROL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 4 (01)
[8]   Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimization for nonconvex economic dispatch [J].
Chaturvedi, K. T. ;
Pandit, Manjaree ;
Srivastava, Laxmi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (03) :1079-1087
[9]  
Dhar S, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS, POWER AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCPCT 2013), P356
[10]  
Dingyu X., 2020, SOLVING OPTIMIZATION, P297