Topology optimization of bracing systems in buildings considering the effects of the wind

被引:1
|
作者
Silva, Paulo U. [1 ]
Pereira, Rayanne E. L. [1 ]
Bono, Gustavo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Programa Posgrad Engn Civil & Ambiental, Av Marielle Franco s n KM 59 Nova PE, BR-50104900 Caruaru, Brazil
关键词
BESO; bracing system; CFD; SIMP; topology optimization; EVOLUTIONARY STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; TALL BUILDINGS; CFD; SHAPE; BESO; LOAD;
D O I
10.12989/sem.2023.86.4.473
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Nowadays, urban centers are increasingly vertical, making architects and engineers look for more efficient tools to analyze the effects of wind on tall buildings. Topology optimization can be used as an efficient tool for the design of bracing systems. Therefore, this work obtained the wind loads that act in the CAARC building, following the Brazilian standard NBR 6123/1988 and using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Four loading situations were considered, using the SIMP and BESO methods to optimize two-dimensional structures. A comparison between the SIMP and BESO methods is presented, showing the differences in the geometry of the solution found by both methods, the percentage variation in the objective function values and the dimensionless processing time. The solutions obtained through the loads obtained by the Brazilian standard are also compared with the numerical solutions obtained by CFD. The results show that the BESO method presented more rigid structures compared to the SIMP method. The bracing structures obtained with the SIMP method always present similar patterns in the distribution and quantity of bars, in contrast to the BESO method where no characteristic topology pattern was observed. It was concluded that even though the structures obtained by the BESO method presented greater stiffness, the SIMP method was less susceptible to the methodology used for the determination of wind loads. Additionally, it was evident the great potential that the combination topology optimization and computational wind engineering have in the design of bracing systems of high functional and aesthetic standards.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 486
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Parametric Structural Topology Optimization of High-Rise Buildings Considering Wind and Gravity Loads
    Goli, Amir
    Alaghmandan, Matin
    Barazandeh, Farzad
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 27 (04)
  • [2] Conceptual design of buildings subjected to wind load by using topology optimization
    Tang, Jiwu
    Xie, Yi Min
    Felicetti, Peter
    WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 18 (01) : 21 - 35
  • [3] Topology optimization of buildings subjected to stochastic wind loads
    Gomez, Fernando
    Spencer, Billie F., Jr.
    Carrion, Juan
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2021, 64
  • [4] Topology Optimization of Building Structures Considering Wind Loading
    Tang, Jiwu
    Xie, Yi Min
    Felicetti, Peter
    PROGRESS IN STRUCTURE, PTS 1-4, 2012, 166-169 : 405 - +
  • [5] Performance-based topology optimization for wind-excited tall buildings: A framework
    Bobby, Sarah
    Spence, Seymour M. J.
    Bernardini, Enrica
    Kareem, Ahsan
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 74 : 242 - 255
  • [6] Optimum bracing design under wind load by using topology optimization
    Kutuk, M. Akif
    Gov, Ibrahim
    WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 18 (05) : 497 - 510
  • [7] Topology Optimization of Bracing Systems for Multistory Steel Frames under Earthquake Loads
    Huang, Jizhuo
    Wang, Zhan
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-6, 2011, 255-260 : 2388 - +
  • [8] Topology optimization of bracing systems using a truss-like material model
    Zhou, Kemin
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2016, 58 (02) : 231 - 242
  • [9] Topology optimization of frame bracing system for natural frequency
    Zhou, Kemin
    Chen, Chahua
    Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 8 (01): : 250 - 256
  • [10] Topology optimization of electromagnetic systems considering magnetization direction
    Wang, SY
    Youn, D
    Moon, H
    Kang, J
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2005, 41 (05) : 1808 - 1811