Does the air pollution level information matter in public perception? Insights from China

被引:5
作者
Yang, Guangfei [1 ]
Ju, Yi [1 ]
Ni, Wenli [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Air pollution; Information disclosure; Public perception; Regression discontinuity design; Weibo posts; REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY DESIGNS; QUALITY PERCEPTION; HEALTH; WARNINGS; BEHAVIOR; OUTDOOR; ALERTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119582
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evidence from the past has previously established that the air information disclosure program has an impact on people's air pollution perception. However, the influence of the concrete information communicated has always been overlooked. In this study, we examine the impact of the announced air pollution level information on public pollution perception. We collect air-related Weibo posts from June 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021, in China, and apply a regression discontinuity (RD) design to quantify the impact. According to our research, when a higher pollution level is announced, people's pollution perception expressed online rises by 3.5%-3.7%, which is approximately equivalent to the response to a more than 100 Air Quality Index (AQI) increase. The episode-based analyses reveal that the impact of pollution level information would fade away along with the persistence or the frequency of the announced pollution episode, which shows a phenomenon of information fatigue. The heterogeneity analyses reveal that the impact of pollution level is significant only when the original pollution level is "Good" or "Lightly Polluted", leading to an increase of pollution perception by 2.8% and 4.8%, respectively. We also find that men, highly-educated, and urban residents are more responsive to the pollution level information. Our study illustrates a detailed picture of how people's perception responds to the announced pollution level information under the AQI standards, and can provide guidance for policymakers when developing the AQI standards to maximize the welfare of the air information.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Air quality guidelines global update 2005
[2]  
Barwick PanleJia., 2019, FOG SMOG VALUE POLLU
[3]  
Best Joel., 2008, SOC PROBL
[4]   Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution [J].
Bickerstaff, K .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 30 (06) :827-840
[5]   Examining localized patterns of air quality perception in Texas: A spatial and statistical analysis [J].
Brody, SD ;
Peck, BM ;
Highfield, WE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (06) :1561-1574
[6]  
Chen H, 2018, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V2, pE19, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30185-7
[7]   Dirty skies lower subjective well-being [J].
Cheng, Lu ;
Mi, Zhifu ;
Wei, Yi-Ming ;
Wang, Shidong ;
Hubacek, Klaus .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 378
[8]   A New Air Quality Perception Scale for Global Assessment of Air Pollution Health Effects [J].
Deguen, Severine ;
Segala, Claire ;
Pedrono, Gaelle ;
Mesbah, Mounir .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2012, 32 (12) :2043-2054
[9]   The Effect of Information Provision on Public Consensus about Climate Change [J].
Deryugina, Tatyana ;
Shurchkov, Olga .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04)
[10]   Community Perceptions of Air Pollution and Related Health Risks in Nairobi Slums [J].
Egondi, Thaddaeus ;
Kyobutungi, Catherine ;
Ng, Nawi ;
Muindi, Kanyiva ;
Oti, Samuel ;
van de Vijver, Steven ;
Ettarh, Remare ;
Rocklov, Joacim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 10 (10) :4851-4868