An empirical study on the response of the energy market to the shock from the artificial intelligence industry

被引:27
作者
Liu, Min [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Hong-Fei [1 ]
Lee, Chien-Chiang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Res Ctr Cent China Econ & Social Dev, Nanchang, Peoples R China
[3] Lebanese Amer Univ, Adnan Kassar Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
[4] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Energy market; Extreme shocks; Cross-quantilogram; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; OIL FUTURES; QUANTILOGRAM; VOLATILITY; SYNCHRONIZATION; DEPENDENCE; SPILLOVER; RETURN; STOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.129655
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper makes the first attempt to look at the response of the energy market to the shock from the AI industry and the role of AI in the energy market risk spillover network. The innovation of the paper lies in adopting a quantile-based and time-varying framework in the empirical analysis. This enables us to reveal the cross-quantile and lead-lag correlations between AI and the energy market. We find that an extreme negative shock from AI tends to correspond to an extreme downward movement in crude oil, gasoline, gas oil, and clean energy markets and the shock response dissipates after 66 days. Meanwhile, the cross-quantile correlations are subject to structural changes once the extreme events arrive. As for the total spillover effect of the energy market, it increases by 5.34 % after AI is considered as a source of uncertainty in the risk spillover network dominated by the crude oil market. Thus, the shock from AI challenges the stability of the energy market. A close relationship between the AI industry and the clean energy market is also identified. We contribute to studying the relationship between the AI industry and the energy market from the perspective of the risk connectedness between the two fields.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Quantile price convergence and spillover effects among Bitcoin, Fintech, and artificial intelligence stocks [J].
Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins ;
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar ;
Lee, Chi-Chuan ;
Ntow-Gyamfi, Matthew .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2023, 23 (01) :187-205
[2]  
Abdulov Rafael, 2020, Procedia Computer Science, P468, DOI [10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.223, 10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.223]
[3]  
Aghion P., 2019, 9 ARTIFICIAL INTELLI, DOI [10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003, DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226613475.003, DOI 10.3386/W23928]
[4]   Robust ensemble learning framework for day-ahead forecasting of household based energy consumption [J].
Alobaidi, Mohammad H. ;
Chebana, Fateh ;
Meguid, Mohamed A. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 212 :997-1012
[5]   Quantile Connectedness: Modeling Tail Behavior in the Topology of Financial Networks [J].
Ando, Tomohiro ;
Greenwood-Nimmo, Matthew ;
Shin, Yongcheol .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (04) :2401-2431
[6]   Time-frequency return co-movement among asset classes around the COVID-19 outbreak: portfolio implications [J].
Athari, Seyed Alireza ;
Hung, Ngo Thai .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2022, 46 (04) :736-756
[7]   Crude Oil futures contracts and commodity markets: New evidence from a TVP-VAR extended joint connectedness approach [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Gabauer, David ;
Umar, Zaghum .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 73
[8]   Jumps and stochastic volatility in crude oil futures prices using conditional moments of integrated volatility [J].
Baum, Christopher F. ;
Zerilli, Paola. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 53 :175-181
[9]  
Baumol WJ, 1967, AM ECON REV, V57, P415
[10]   Can cryptocurrencies hedge oil price fluctuations? A pandemic perspective [J].
Bedowska-Sojka, Barbara ;
Kliber, Agata .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 115