True to type? EU-style date marking and the valuation of perishable food

被引:8
作者
D'Amato, Alessio [1 ,2 ]
Goeschl, Timo [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Lore, Luisa [7 ]
Zoli, Mariangela [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
[2] SEEDS, Rome, Italy
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Alfred Weber Inst Econ, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg Ctr Environm, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Leibniz Ctr European Econ Res ZEW, Mannheim, Germany
[6] RWI Res Network, Essen, Germany
[7] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Econ, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Date marking; Food waste; Consumer valuation; Information-based policies; Multiple price list experiment; In-store experiment; PERCEIVED RISK; LABELS; WILLINGNESS; WASTE; PRICE; ATTITUDES; PRODUCTS; BEHAVIOR; PAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102381
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Date marking is intended to help consumers make informed food safety and quality choices when confronted with perishable food products. We provide causal in-store evidence on how EU-style date marking (best before and use by) influences consumers' valuation of perishable food around the expiry date. In a preparatory survey (n = 100), we first identify perishable food items amenable to experimental manipulation. A modified multiple price list (MPL) experiment (n = 200) then tests shoppers' valuation of perishable food with expiry dates in the future and the past. We vary date mark type (use-by versus best-before) and information status (with and without education) while preventing free disposal censoring. We find that expiry dates affect consumer valuation. Variation in date mark type has little practical relevance. Educating consumers about the meaning of date mark types reduces willingness to pay for potentially unsafe food, but does not increase it for more durable items. An attentiveness experiment (n = 160) finds that inattention and consumers' native understanding of current date marks can explain the evidence from the modified MPL experiment. Jointly, these results help explaining existing observational evidence and assessing the prospects of consumer education campaigns.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006) [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten Igel ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) :99-100
[2]   Valuation using multiple price list formats [J].
Anderson, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2007, 39 (4-6) :675-682
[3]   Eliciting and Utilizing Willingness to Pay: Evidence from Field Trials in Northern Ghana [J].
Berry, James ;
Fischer, Greg ;
Guiteras, Raymond P. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (04) :1436-1473
[4]   Testing willingness to pay elicitation mechanisms in the field: Evidence from Uganda [J].
Burchardi, Konrad B. ;
de Quidt, Jonathan ;
Gulesci, Selim ;
Lerva, Benedetta ;
Tripodi, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2021, 152
[5]   Subject Pools and Deception in Agricultural and Resource Economics Experiments [J].
Cason, Timothy N. ;
Wu, Steven Y. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 73 (03) :743-758
[6]   Consumer Imperfect Information in the Market for Expired and Nearly Expired Foods and Implications for Reducing Food Waste [J].
Collart, Alba J. ;
Interis, Matthew G. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11)
[7]   WHICH DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, IF ANY, SHOULD BE ALLOWED IN EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH? RESULTS FROM SURVEYS OF APPLIED EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMISTS AND STUDENTS [J].
Colson, Gregory ;
Corrigan, Jay R. ;
Grebitus, Carola ;
Loureiro, Maria L. ;
Rousu, Matthew C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 98 (02) :610-621
[8]   THE DISPARITY BETWEEN WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY MEASURES OF VALUE [J].
COURSEY, DL ;
HOVIS, JL ;
SCHULZE, WD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (03) :679-690
[9]   Rebates, matches, and consumer behavior [J].
Davis, DD ;
Millner, EL .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2005, 72 (02) :410-421
[10]  
EU-Council, 2016, COUNC CONCL FOOD LOS