Firm innovation and covenant tightness

被引:9
作者
Ma, Zhiming [1 ]
Novoselov, Kirill E. [2 ]
Stice, Derrald [3 ]
Zhang, Yue [4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Guanghua Sch Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, HKU Business Sch, Accounting Area, Pok Fu Lam, 1202 KK Leung Bldg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Firm innovation; Debt covenants; Covenant strictness; Patent filings; Patents; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PROJECT SELECTION; AGENCY COSTS; DEBT; CONTRACTS; MARKET; DETERMINANTS; PRIVATE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-022-09712-1
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study explores the association between firm innovation and loan covenant strictness. We find that lenders construct stricter contracts for firms filing more patents, consistent with lenders imposing more oversight on firms when they enter the commercialization stage after having demonstrated their inventiveness. Our results hold under propensity score matching and entropy balancing, and when exploiting the American Inventors Protection Act as a shock affecting unrelated banks' access to patent filing information. The relationship we document is stronger when the lender has more expertise and for firms with higher default risk. We demonstrate that borrowers' patent filings are associated with more future R&D and capital investment and with a higher likelihood of their acquiring firms in the industry of their patent filings. Our results are consistent with the theoretical prediction that lenders interpret patent filings as indicative of high inventive potential that requires stricter discipline and oversight by lenders in order to be converted into actual business success, and with them designing debt contract terms accordingly.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 193
页数:43
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]  
ABRAMOVITZ M, 1956, AM ECON REV, V46, P5
[2]   Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Subramanian, Krishnamurthy V. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (12) :4949-4988
[3]  
Adner R, 2004, ACAD MANAGE REV, V29, P74, DOI 10.2307/20159010
[4]   Adaptive capacity to technological change: A microfoundational approach [J].
Aggarwal, Vikas A. ;
Posen, Hart E. ;
Workiewicz, Maciej .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (06) :1212-1231
[5]   AN INCOMPLETE CONTRACTS APPROACH TO FINANCIAL CONTRACTING [J].
AGHION, P ;
BOLTON, P .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1992, 59 (03) :473-494
[6]   FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY [J].
ALTMAN, EI .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) :589-609
[7]   Patents as collateral [J].
Amable, Bruno ;
Chatelain, Jean-Bernard ;
Ralf, Kirsten .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2010, 34 (06) :1092-1104
[8]   Credit supply and corporate innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Schneider, Cedric ;
Zaldokas, Alminas .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 109 (03) :835-855
[9]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[10]  
Atanassov J., 2007, Finance and innovation: The case of publicly traded firm