Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter

被引:4
作者
Flament, Emeline [1 ]
Blanc-Petitjean, Pauline [2 ]
Koch, Antoine [1 ]
Deruelle, Philippe [1 ]
Le Ray, Camille [3 ]
Sanan, Nicolas [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Strasbourg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1 Ave Moliere, F-67200 Strasbourg, France
[2] Rennes Univ Hosp, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, 2 Rue Henri Leguilloux, F-35033 Rennes, France
[3] FHU prema, Hosp Cochin, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Port Royal Matern Unit, 123 Bd Port Royal, F-75014 Paris, France
[4] Strasbourg Univ, INSERM 1121 Biomat & Bioengn, 1 Pl Hop, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[5] Strasbourg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ave Moliere, F-67200 Strasbourg, France
关键词
Induction of labor; Cervical ripening; Prostaglandins; Balloon catheter; Maternal satisfaction; FOLEY CATHETER; INDUCTION; LABOR; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100202
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Induction of labor concerns about 29 % of women in Unites States and 33 % in Europe. Among the various methods for cervical ripening, the efficacy and safety profiles of oral misoprostol and balloon catheter are comparable, but data in the literature on maternal satisfaction during induction of labor are few. The objective of this study was to assess the satisfaction of women who chose the method of cervical ripening, i.e. either balloon catheter or oral misoprostol, for induction of labor.Study design: This retrospective study asked women who had undergone induction of labor between February 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. After receiving verbal and written information, the choice of method between oral misoprostol and balloon catheter was left to the patient's free appreciation. Satisfaction was assessed by means of a questionnaire distributed to all women during their stay in the maternity unit. The principal assessment criterion was based on women' inclination to choose the same cervical ripening method if induction of labor were to prove necessary in a future pregnancy, and their willingness to recommend this method to a friend. Univariate analyses were conducted using Student's t-test, Chi-2 test or Fisher's exact test. Results: On 575 women eligible for analysis, 365 (63.5 %) of these women replied to the satisfaction questionnaire. Of this number, 236 (64.7 %) chose cervical ripening by balloon catheter, and 129 (35.3 %) by oral misoprostol. No significant difference was found between the two groups: 68.2 % of women in the balloon catheter group would opt for the same method of cervical ripening if it proved necessary in a future pregnancy and 64.7% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, versus 65.9 % and 63.6 % in the oral misoprostol group, respectively. Women were overall pleased to be able to choose their method of cervical ripening: 90.5 % of patients in the balloon catheter group and 95.3 % in the oral misoprostol groupConclusions: When women choose the method of cervical ripening, satisfaction is overall good, irrespective of the method, whether by balloon catheter or misoprostol.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Oral misoprostol for induction of labour [J].
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Aflaifel, Nasreen ;
Weeks, Andrew .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (06)
[2]   Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour [J].
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Kelly, Anthony J. ;
Dowswell, Therese .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (04)
[3]   Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol versus transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS) [J].
Alkmark, Marten ;
Carlsson, Ylva ;
Wendel, Sophia Brismar ;
Elden, Helen ;
Fadl, Helena ;
Jonsson, Maria ;
Ladfors, Lars ;
Saltvedt, Sissel ;
Sengpiel, Verena ;
Wessberg, Anna ;
Wikstrom, Anna-Karin ;
Hagberg, Henrik ;
Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (08) :1463-1477
[4]  
Anjali D, 2022, AJOG Glob Rep, V2
[5]   Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
不详 .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 20 (65) :1-+
[6]  
[Anonymous], Clinical Guidance for the Integration of the Findings of the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) Study
[7]   Measuring women's experience of induction of labor using prostaglandin vaginal gel [J].
Beckmann, Michael ;
Thompson, Rachel ;
Miller, Yvette ;
Prosser, Samantha J. ;
Flenady, Vicki ;
Kumar, Sailesh .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 210 :189-195
[8]  
BISHOP EH, 1964, OBSTET GYNECOL, V24, P266
[9]   Development of a questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE) [J].
Carquillat, Pierre ;
Vendittelli, Francoise ;
Perneger, Thomas ;
Guittier, Marie-Julia .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
[10]   A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour [J].
Chen, W. ;
Xue, J. ;
Peprah, M. K. ;
Wen, S. W. ;
Walker, M. ;
Gao, Y. ;
Tang, Y. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (03) :346-354