Five Common Misconceptions About Privacy-Preserving Internet of Things

被引:5
作者
Abu Alsheikh, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Internet of Things; Data privacy; Privacy; Sensors; Regulation; Technological innovation; Differential privacy;
D O I
10.1109/MCOM.001.2200097
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Billions of devices in the Internet of Things (IoT) collect sensitive data about people, creating data privacy risks and breach vulnerabilities. Accordingly, data privacy preservation is vital for sustaining the proliferation of IoT services. In particular, privacy-preserving IoT connects devices embedded with sensors and maintains the data privacy of people. However, common misconceptions exist among IoT researchers, service providers, and users about privacy-preserving IoT.This article refutes five common misconceptions about privacy-preserving IoT concerning data sensing and innovation, regulations, and privacy safeguards. For example, IoT users have a common misconception that no data collection is permitted in data privacy regulations. On the other hand, IoT service providers often think data privacy impedes IoT sensing and innovation. Addressing these misconceptions is essential for making progress in privacy-preserving IoT. This article refutes such common misconceptions using real-world experiments and online survey research. First, the experiments indicate that data privacy should not be perceived as an impediment in IoT but as an opportunity to increase customer retention and trust. Second, privacy-preserving IoT is not exclusively a regulatory problem but also a functional necessity that must be incorporated in the early stages of any IoT design. Third, people do not trust services that lack sufficient privacy measures. Fourth, conventional data security principles do not guarantee data privacy protection, and data privacy can be exposed even if data is securely stored. Fifth, IoT decentralization does not attain absolute privacy preservation.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 157
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, IEEE Std 1588-2019 (Revision ofIEEE Std 1588-2008) IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9120376
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, CISC ANN INT REP 201
[3]  
California Civil Code, 2018, California Consumer Privacy Act
[4]   The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy [J].
Dwork, Cynthia ;
Roth, Aaron .
FOUNDATIONS AND TRENDS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2013, 9 (3-4) :211-406
[5]  
European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2016, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
[6]   Protection Goals for Privacy Engineering [J].
Hansen, Marit ;
Jensen, Meiko ;
Rost, Martin .
2015 IEEE SECURITY AND PRIVACY WORKSHOPS (SPW), 2015, :159-166
[7]  
He Yinghui, 2020, International Journal of Computers and Applications, P1, DOI [10.1109/WCNCW48565.2020.9124848, DOI 10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9207273, DOI 10.1080/1206212X.2020.1743040, DOI 10.1109/WCNC45663.2020.9120749]
[8]  
Kwapisz J. R., 2011, ACM SigKDD Explor. Newslett., V12, P74, DOI 10.1145/1964897.1964918
[9]   Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wild [J].
Liu, Ziwei ;
Luo, Ping ;
Wang, Xiaogang ;
Tang, Xiaoou .
2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV), 2015, :3730-3738
[10]   Federated Learning at the Network Edge: When Not All Nodes Are Created Equal [J].
Malandrino, Francesco ;
Chiasserini, Carla Fabiana .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2021, 59 (07) :68-73