Decomposing social risk preferences for health and wealth

被引:3
作者
Attema, Arthur E. [1 ]
L'Haridon, Olivier [2 ,3 ]
van de Kuilen, Gijs [4 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, EsCHER, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Rennes 1, CREM, Rennes, France
[3] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Social risk; Inequality; Risk aversion; INDIVIDUALISTIC ETHICS; CARDINAL WELFARE; EQUITY; INEQUALITY; ATTITUDES; FAIRNESS; AVERSION; UTILITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102757
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study reports the results of the first artefactual field experiment designed to measure the prevalence of aversion toward different components of social risks in a large and demographically representative sample. We identify social risk preferences for health and wealth for losses and gains, and decompose these attitudes into four different dimensions: individual risk, collective risk, ex-post inequality, and ex-ante inequality. The results of a non-parametric analysis suggest that aversion to risk and inequality is the mean preference for outcomes in health and wealth in the domain of gains and losses. A parametric decomposition of aversion to risk and inequality shows that respondents are averse to ex-post and ex-ante inequality in health and wealth for gains and losses. Likewise, respondents are averse to collective risk, but neutral to individual risk, which highlights the importance of considering different components of social risk preferences when managing social health and wealth risks.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Abasolo I, 2004, J HEALTH ECON, V23, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.08.003
[2]  
Abasolo I., 2004, THEORY DEC, V74, P539
[3]   Comparing aversions to outcome inequality and social risk in health and income: An empirical analysis using hypothetical scenarios with losses [J].
Abasolo, Ignacio ;
Tsuchiya, Aki .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2020, 29 (01) :85-97
[4]   Sign-dependence in intertemporal choice [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
l'Haridon, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2013, 47 (03) :225-253
[5]  
Asaria M., 2021, CESIFO WORKING PAPER, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3907733, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3907733]
[6]   MEASUREMENT OF INEQUALITY [J].
ATKINSON, AB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1970, 2 (03) :244-263
[7]   An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory [J].
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Brouwer, Werner B. F. ;
l'Haridon, Olivier ;
Luis Pinto, Jose .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 48 :121-134
[8]   Estimating sign-dependent societal preferences for quality of life [J].
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Brouwer, Werner B. F. ;
l'Haridon, Olivier ;
Pinto, Jose Luis .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 43 :229-243
[9]  
Bardsley N., 2009, EXPT EC RETHINKING R
[10]   On the measurement of inequality under uncertainty [J].
BenPorath, E ;
Gilboa, I ;
Schmeidler, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1997, 75 (01) :194-204