Modeling Indium Extraction, Supply, Price, Use and Recycling 1930-2200 Using the WORLD7 Model: Implication for the Imaginaries of Sustainable Europe 2050

被引:5
作者
Sverdrup, Harald Ulrik [1 ]
vanAllen, Ole [1 ]
Haraldsson, Hordur Valdimar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Game Sch, Syst Dynam, Holsetgaten 31, N-2315 Hamar, Norway
[2] European Environm Agcy, Kongens Nytorv 6, DK-1050 Copenhagen, Denmark
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
WORLD7; Indium; Scarcity; Sustainability; Dynamic simulations; European imaginaries; SUBSTANCE FLOW-ANALYSIS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; BY-PRODUCT; ENERGY SYSTEM; MARKET PRICE; METALS; AVAILABILITY; GALLIUM; STOCKS; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1007/s11053-023-10296-z
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The increasing need for indium in photovoltaic technologies is set to exceed available supply. Current estimates suggest only 25% of global solar cell demand for indium can be met, posing a significant challenge for the energy transition. Using the WORLD7 model, this study evaluated the sustainability of indium production and overall market supply. The model considers both mass balance and the dynamic interplay of supply-demand in determining indium prices. It is estimated that a total of 312,000 tons of indium can be extracted. However, the primary hindrance to supply is the availability of extraction opportunities and the necessary infrastructure. Unless we improve production capacity, indium may face shortages, hindering the advancement of pivotal technologies. A concern observed is the insufficient rate of indium recycling. Boosting this could greatly alleviate supply pressures. Projections indicate that indium production will reach its peak between 2025 and 2030, while the peak for photovoltaic solar panels due to indium shortages is anticipated around 2090, with an installed capacity of 1200 GW. Thus, the growth of photovoltaic capacity may lag behind actual demand. For a sustainable future, understanding the role of essential metals like indium is crucial. The European Environment Agency (EEA) introduced four "imaginaries" depicting visions of a sustainable Europe by 2050 (SE2050), each representing a unique future set within specific parameters. Currently, Europe is heavily dependent on imports for tech metals and has limited recycling capabilities, putting it at a disadvantage in a global context. To achieve sustainability, there is a need for improved infrastructure for extraction, recycling, and conservation of metals such as indium. These resources are crucial for realizing Europe's 2050 sustainability objectives. Furthermore, understanding the role of these metals in wider overarching strategies is vital for envisioning a sustainable European Union by 2050, as depicted in the Imaginaries.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 570
页数:32
相关论文
共 139 条
  • [1] Material challenges for solar cells in the twenty-first century: directions in emerging technologies
    Almosni, Samy
    Delamarre, Amaury
    Jehl, Zacharie
    Suchet, Daniel
    Cojocaru, Ludmila
    Giteau, Maxime
    Behaghel, Benoit
    Julian, Anatole
    Ibrahim, Camille
    Tatry, Lea
    Wang, Haibin
    Kubo, Takaya
    Uchida, Satoshi
    Segawa, Hiroshi
    Miyashita, Naoya
    Tamaki, Ryo
    Shoji, Yasushi
    Yoshida, Katsuhisa
    Ahsan, Nazmul
    Watanabe, Kentaro
    Inoue, Tomoyuki
    Sugiyama, Masakazu
    Nakano, Yoshiaki
    Hamamura, Tomofumi
    Toupance, Thierry
    Olivier, Celine
    Chambon, Sylvain
    Vignau, Laurence
    Geffroy, Camille
    Cloutet, Eric
    Hadziioannou, Georges
    Cavassilas, Nicolas
    Rale, Pierre
    Cattoni, Andrea
    Collin, Stephane
    Gibelli, Francois
    Paire, Myriam
    Lombez, Laurent
    Aureau, Damien
    Bouttemy, Muriel
    Etcheberry, Arnaud
    Okada, Yoshitaka
    Guillemoles, Jean-Francois
    [J]. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2018, 19 (01) : 336 - 369
  • [2] Material availability and the supply chain: Risks, effects, and responses
    Alonso, Elisa
    Gregory, Jeremy
    Field, Frank
    Kirchain, Randolph
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (19) : 6649 - 6656
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, N 60 MINING NEWS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Study on the review of the list of Critical Raw Materials
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, 20051209 US GEOL SUR
  • [6] Bardi U., 2013, EXTRACTED QUEST MINE, P299
  • [7] Bleiwas DI, 2010, US Geol Surv Circular, V1365, DOI DOI 10.3133/CIR1365
  • [8] International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth -: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR
    Bringezu, S
    Schütz, H
    Steger, S
    Baudisch, J
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 51 (1-2) : 97 - 124
  • [9] Brown TJ., 2015, WORLD MINERAL PRODUC, P88
  • [10] Managing Critical Materials with a Technology-Specific Stocks and Flows Model
    Busch, Jonathan
    Steinberger, Julia K.
    Dawson, David A.
    Purnell, Phil
    Roelich, Katy
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (02) : 1298 - 1305