Causal learning by infants and young children: From computational theories to language practices

被引:3
作者
Basch, Samantha [1 ]
Wang, Su-hua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Psychol Dept, Santa Cruz, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Psychol, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
关键词
Bayesian models; causal learning; Explanation-Based Learning (EBL); language practices; EXPLANATION; EVENTS; CATEGORIZATION; EXPLORATION; KNOWLEDGE; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; SPEECH; SOCIALIZATION; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1002/wcs.1678
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Causal reasoning-the ability to reason about causal relations between events-is fundamental to understanding how the world works. This paper reviews two prominent theories on early causal learning and offers possibilities for theory bridging. Both theories grow out of computational modeling and have significant areas of overlap while differing in several respects. Explanation-Based Learning (EBL) focuses on young infants' learning about causal concepts of physical objects and events, whereas Bayesian models have been used to describe causal reasoning beyond infancy across various concept domains. Connecting the two models offers a more integrated approach to clarifying the developmental processes in causal reasoning from early infancy through later childhood. We further suggest that everyday language practices offer a promising space for theory bridging. We provide a review of selective work on caregiver-child conversations, in particular, on the use of scaffolding language including causal talk and pedagogical questions. Linking the research on language practices to the two cognitive theories, we point out directions for further research to integrate EBL and Bayesian models and clarify how causal learning unfolds in real life. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Learning Cognitive Biology > Cognitive Development
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Aguiar Andrea, 2002, Cogn Psychol, V45, P267
[2]   Exploring Individual Differences in Preschoolers' Causal Stance [J].
Alvarez, Aubry ;
Booth, Amy E. .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 52 (03) :411-422
[3]   Event categorization in infancy [J].
Baillargeon, R ;
Wang, SH .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (02) :85-93
[4]   OBJECT PERMANENCE IN YOUNG INFANTS - FURTHER EVIDENCE [J].
BAILLARGEON, R ;
DEVOS, J .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 62 (06) :1227-1246
[5]  
Baillargeon R., 2011, The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, Vsecond, P11, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444325485.CH1
[6]  
Baillargeon R, 2006, ATTENTION PERFORM, P163
[7]   Explanation-based learning in infancy [J].
Baillargeon, Renee ;
DeJong, Gerald F. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2017, 24 (05) :1511-1526
[8]  
Baillargeon R, 2012, JACOBS FOUND SER ADO, P33
[9]   Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy: An Integrative Account [J].
Baillargeon, Renee ;
Stavans, Maayan ;
Wu, Di ;
Gertner, Yael ;
Setoh, Peipei ;
Kittredge, Audrey K. ;
Bernard, Amelie .
LANGUAGE LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 8 (01) :4-46
[10]  
Basch S., 2024, CULTURAL VARIATION Q