Efficient physics-based learned reconstruction methods for real-time 3D near-field MIMO radar imaging

被引:4
作者
Manisali, Irfan [1 ]
Oral, Okyanus [1 ]
Oktem, Figen S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ METU, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Radar imaging; Near-field microwave imaging; Deep learning; 3D inverse imaging problems; Sparse MIMO array; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORK; INVERSE PROBLEMS; RECOVERY; ARRAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.dsp.2023.104274
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Near-field multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar imaging systems have recently gained significant attention. These systems generally reconstruct the three-dimensional (3D) complex-valued reflectivity distribution of the scene using sparse measurements. Consequently, imaging quality highly relies on the image reconstruction approach. Existing analytical reconstruction approaches suffer from either high computational cost or low image quality. In this paper, we develop novel non-iterative deep learning-based reconstruction methods for real-time near-field MIMO imaging. The goal is to achieve high image quality with low computational cost at compressive settings. The developed approaches have two stages. In the first approach, physics-based initial stage performs adjoint operation to back-project the measurements to the image-space, and deep neural network (DNN)-based second stage converts the 3D backprojected measurements to a magnitude-only reflectivity image. Since scene reflectivities often have random phase, DNN processes directly the magnitude of the adjoint result. As DNN, 3D U-Net is used to jointly exploit range and cross-range correlations. To comparatively evaluate the significance of exploiting physics in a learning-based approach, two additional approaches that replace the physics-based first stage with fully connected layers are also developed as purely learning based methods. The performance is also analyzed by changing the DNN architecture for the second stage to include complex-valued processing (instead of magnitude-only processing), 2D convolution kernels (instead of 3D), and ResNet architecture (instead of U-Net). Moreover, we develop a synthesizer to generate large-scale dataset for training the neural networks with 3D extended targets. We illustrate the performance through experimental data and extensive simulations. The results show the effectiveness of the developed physics based learned reconstruction approach compared to commonly used approaches in terms of both runtime and image quality at highly compressive settings. Our source codes and dataset are made available at https:// github .com /METU -SPACE-Lab /Efficient -Learned-3D -Near-Field-MIMO -Imaging upon publication to advance research in this field.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [21] Tensor-Based Match Pursuit Algorithm for MIMO Radar Imaging
    Huang, Ping
    Li, Xin
    Wang, Hui
    [J]. RADIOENGINEERING, 2018, 27 (02) : 580 - 586
  • [22] Deep iterative reconstruction for phase retrieval
    Isil, Cagatay
    Oktem, Figen S.
    Koc, Aykut
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2019, 58 (20) : 5422 - 5431
  • [23] Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
    Jin, Kyong Hwan
    McCann, Michael T.
    Froustey, Emmanuel
    Unser, Michael
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2017, 26 (09) : 4509 - 4522
  • [24] Enhanced Millimeter-Wave 3-D Imaging via Complex-Valued Fully Convolutional Neural Network
    Jing, Handan
    Li, Shiyong
    Miao, Ke
    Wang, Shuoguang
    Cui, Xiaoxi
    Zhao, Guoqiang
    Sun, Houjun
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [25] Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
    Johnson, Justin
    Alahi, Alexandre
    Li Fei-Fei
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2016, PT II, 2016, 9906 : 694 - 711
  • [26] Microwave Radar-Based Differential Breast Cancer Imaging: Imaging in Homogeneous Breast Phantoms and Low Contrast Scenarios
    Klemm, Maciej
    Leendertz, Jack. A.
    Gibbins, David
    Craddock, Ian J.
    Preece, Alan
    Benjamin, Ralph
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2010, 58 (07) : 2337 - 2344
  • [27] Kocamis MB, 2017, EUR SIGNAL PR CONF, P1952, DOI 10.23919/EUSIPCO.2017.8081550
  • [28] ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
    Krizhevsky, Alex
    Sutskever, Ilya
    Hinton, Geoffrey E.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2017, 60 (06) : 84 - 90
  • [29] ReconNet: Non-Iterative Reconstruction of Images from Compressively Sensed Measurements
    Kulkarni, Kuldeep
    Lohit, Suhas
    Turaga, Pavan
    Kerviche, Ronan
    Ashok, Amit
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, : 449 - 458
  • [30] Near-Field Radar Imaging via Compressive Sensing
    Li, Shiyong
    Zhao, Guoqiang
    Li, Houmin
    Ren, Bailing
    Hu, Weidong
    Liu, Yong
    Yu, Weihua
    Sun, Houjun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2015, 63 (02) : 828 - 833