Benchmarking deep learning methods for predicting CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA on- and off-target activities

被引:11
|
作者
Zhang, Guishan [3 ]
Luo, Ye [3 ]
Dai, Xianhua [1 ,4 ]
Dai, Zhiming [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Cyber Sci & Technol, Shenzhen 518107, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Shantou Univ, Coll Engn, Shantou, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Cyber Sci & Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat sen Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CRISPR/Cas9; sgRNA; deep learning; on-target; off-target; GUIDE RNA DESIGN; CHROMATIN ACCESSIBILITY; CLEAVAGE EFFICIENCY; SEQUENCE FEATURES; PAM COMPATIBILITY; NEURAL-NETWORKS; GENOME; CRISPR-CAS9; CAS9; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1093/bib/bbad333
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In silico design of single guide RNA (sgRNA) plays a critical role in clustered regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system. Continuous efforts are aimed at improving sgRNA design with efficient on-target activity and reduced off-target mutations. In the last 5 years, an increasing number of deep learning-based methods have achieved breakthrough performance in predicting sgRNA on- and off-target activities. Nevertheless, it is worthwhile to systematically evaluate these methods for their predictive abilities. In this review, we conducted a systematic survey on the progress in prediction of on- and off-target editing. We investigated the performances of 10 mainstream deep learning-based on-target predictors using nine public datasets with different sample sizes. We found that in most scenarios, these methods showed superior predictive power on large- and medium-scale datasets than on small-scale datasets. In addition, we performed unbiased experiments to provide in-depth comparison of eight representative approaches for off-target prediction on 12 publicly available datasets with various imbalanced ratios of positive/negative samples. Most methods showed excellent performance on balanced datasets but have much room for improvement on moderate- and severe-imbalanced datasets. This study provides comprehensive perspectives on CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA on- and off-target activity prediction and improvement for method development.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transformer-based anti-noise models for CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activities prediction
    Guan, Zengrui
    Jiang, Zhenran
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 24 (03)
  • [42] Designing Safer CRISPR/Cas9 Therapeutics for HIV: Defining Factors That Regulate and Technologies Used to Detect Off-Target Editing
    Sullivan, Neil T.
    Allen, Alexander G.
    Atkins, Andrew J.
    Chung, Cheng-Han
    Dampier, Will
    Nonnemacher, Michael R.
    Wigdahl, Brian
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [43] Amplification-free long-read sequencing reveals unforeseen CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity
    Hoijer, Ida
    Johansson, Josefin
    Gudmundsson, Sanna
    Chin, Chen-Shan
    Bunikis, Ignas
    Haggqvist, Susana
    Emmanouilidou, Anastasia
    Wilbe, Maria
    den Hoed, Marcel
    Bondeson, Marie-Louise
    Feuk, Lars
    Gyllensten, Ulf
    Ameur, Adam
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [44] DNA stretching induces Cas9 off-target activity
    Newton, Matthew D.
    Taylor, Benjamin J.
    Driessen, Rosalie P. C.
    Roos, Leonie
    Cvetesic, Nevena
    Allyjaun, Shenaz
    Lenhard, Boris
    Cuomo, Maria Emanuela
    Rueda, David S.
    NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (03) : 185 - +
  • [45] CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiency correlates strongly with target-sgRNA folding stability: from physical mechanism to off-target assessment
    Xu, Xiaojun
    Duan, Dongsheng
    Chen, Shi-Jie
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [46] CRISPRLearner: A Deep Learning-Based System to Predict CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA On-Target Cleavage Efficiency
    Dimauro, Giovanni
    Colagrande, Pierpasquale
    Carlucci, Roberto
    Ventura, Mario
    Bevilacqua, Vitoantonio
    Caivano, Danilo
    ELECTRONICS, 2019, 8 (12)
  • [47] On- and off-target effects of paired CRISPR-Cas nickase in primary human cells
    Klermund, Julia
    Rhiel, Manuel
    Kocher, Thomas
    Chmielewski, Kay Ole
    Bischof, Johannes
    Andrieux, Geoffroy
    el Gaz, Melina
    Hainzl, Stefan
    Boerries, Melanie
    Cornu, Tatjana I.
    Koller, Ulrich
    Cathomen, Toni
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2024, 32 (05)
  • [48] Evaluation of Homology-Independent CRISPR-Cas9 Off-Target Assessment Methods
    Chaudhari, Hemangi G.
    Penterman, Jon
    Whitton, Holly J.
    Spencer, Sarah J.
    Flanagan, Nicole
    Zhang, Maria C. Lei
    Huang, Elaine
    Khedkar, Aditya S.
    Toomey, J. Mike
    Shearer, Courtney A.
    Needham, Alexander W.
    Ho, Tony W.
    Kulman, John D.
    Cradick, T. J.
    Kernytsky, Andrew
    CRISPR JOURNAL, 2020, 3 (06): : 440 - 453
  • [49] Off-Target Analysis in Gene Editing and Applications for Clinical Translation of CRISPR/Cas9 in HIV-1 Therapy
    Atkins, Andrew
    Chung, Cheng-Han
    Allen, Alexander G. G.
    Dampier, Will
    Gurrola, Theodore E. E.
    Sariyer, Ilker K. K.
    Nonnemacher, Michael R. R.
    Wigdahl, Brian
    FRONTIERS IN GENOME EDITING, 2021, 3
  • [50] Detection of on-target and off-target mutations generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and other sequence-specific nucleases
    Zischewski, Julia
    Fischer, Rainer
    Bortesi, Luisa
    BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2017, 35 (01) : 95 - 104