The role of genetics and epigenetics in sex differences in human survival

被引:8
作者
Iannuzzi, Vincenzo [1 ,2 ]
Bacalini, Maria Giulia [3 ]
Franceschi, Claudio [4 ]
Giuliani, Cristina [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Biol Geol & Environm Sci, Lab Mol Anthropol, Via Selmi 3, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Ctr Genome Biol, Dept Biol Geol & Environm Sci, Via Selmi 3, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[3] IRCCS Ist Sci Neurolog Bologna, Bologna, Italy
[4] Lobachevsky Univ, Dept Appl Math, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia
[5] Lobachevsky Univ, Lab Syst Biol Aging, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia
关键词
Survival; Lifespan; Genetics; Epigenetics; Sex chromosomes; DNA methylation; Epigenetic clocks; X-CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION; WOMEN LIVE LONGER; DNA METHYLATION; PERIPHERAL-BLOOD; LIFE-SPAN; REPRODUCTION; EVOLUTION; RISK; MORTALITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s41118-023-00181-1
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Sex differences in human survival have been extensively investigated in many studies that have in part uncovered the biological determinants that promote a longer life in females with respect to males. Moreover, researches performed in the past years have prompted increased awareness about the biological effects of environmental factors that can modulate the magnitude of the sex gap in survival. Besides the genetic background, epigenetic modifications like DNA methylation, that can modulate cell function, have been particularly studied in this framework. In this review, we aim to summarize the role of the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in promoting female advantage from the early in life ("INNATE" features), and in influencing the magnitude of the gap in sex differences in survival and ageing ("VARIABLE" features). After briefly discussing the biological bases of sex determination in humans, we will provide much evidence showing that (i) "innate" mechanisms common to all males and to all females (both genetic and epigenetic) play a major role in sex differences in lifespan; (ii) "variable" genetic and epigenetic patterns, that vary according to context, populations and exposures to different environments, can affect the magnitude of the gap in sex differences in survival. Then we will describe recent findings in the use of epigenetic clocks to uncover sex differences in biological age and thus potentially in mortality. In conclusion, we will discuss how environmental factors cannot be kept apart from the biological factors providing evidence from the field of human ecology.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] Epigenetic Pathways in Human Disease: The Impact of DNA Methylation on Stress-Related Pathogenesis and Current Challenges in Biomarker Development
    Argentieri, M. Austin
    Nagarajan, Sairaman
    Seddighzadeh, Bobak
    Baccarelli, Andrea A.
    Shields, Alexandra E.
    [J]. EBIOMEDICINE, 2017, 18 : 327 - 350
  • [2] Sex Differences in Lifespan
    Austad, Steven N.
    Fischer, Kathleen E.
    [J]. CELL METABOLISM, 2016, 23 (06) : 1022 - 1033
  • [3] Skewed X-Chromosome Inactivation in Women Affected by Alzheimer's Disease
    Bajic, Vladan
    Mandusic, Vesna
    Stefanova, Elka
    Bozovic, Ana
    Davidovic, Radoslav
    Zivkovic, Lada
    Cabarkapa, Andrea
    Spremo-Potparevic, Biljana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2015, 43 (04) : 1251 - 1259
  • [4] Getting to the Root of Aging
    Baudisch, Annette
    Vaupel, James W.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 338 (6107) : 618 - 619
  • [5] Genome-wide linkage analysis for human longevity: Genetics of Healthy Aging Study
    Beekman, Marian
    Blanche, Helene
    Perola, Markus
    Hervonen, Anti
    Bezrukov, Vladyslav
    Sikora, Ewa
    Flachsbart, Friederike
    Christiansen, Lene
    De Craen, Anton J. M.
    Kirkwood, Tom B. L.
    Rea, Irene Maeve
    Poulain, Michel
    Robine, Jean-Marie
    Valensin, Silvana
    Stazi, Maria Antonietta
    Passarino, Giuseppe
    Deiana, Luca
    Gonos, Efstathios S.
    Paternoster, Lavinia
    Sorensen, Thorkild I. A.
    Tan, Qihua
    Helmer, Quinta
    van den Akker, Erik B.
    Deelen, Joris
    Martella, Francesca
    Cordell, Heather J.
    Ayers, Kristin L.
    Vaupel, James W.
    Tornwall, Outi
    Johnson, Thomas E.
    Schreiber, Stefan
    Lathrop, Mark
    Skytthe, Axel
    Westendorp, Rudi G. J.
    Christensen, Kaare
    Gampe, Jutta
    Nebel, Almut
    Houwing-Duistermaat, Jeanine J.
    Slagboom, Pieternella Eline
    Franceschi, Claudio
    [J]. AGING CELL, 2013, 12 (02) : 184 - 193
  • [6] Why the disposable soma theory cannot explain why women live longer and why we age
    Blagosklonny, Mikhail V.
    [J]. AGING-US, 2010, 2 (12): : 884 - 887
  • [7] Growth and aging: a common molecular mechanism
    Blagosklonny, Mikhail V.
    Hall, Michael N.
    [J]. AGING-US, 2009, 1 (04): : 357 - 362
  • [8] Bonafè M, 2001, EUR J IMMUNOL, V31, P2357, DOI 10.1002/1521-4141(200108)31:8<2357::AID-IMMU2357>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-X
  • [10] Sex-specific aging in animals: Perspective and future directions
    Bronikowski, Anne M.
    Meisel, Richard P.
    Biga, Peggy R.
    Walters, James R.
    Mank, Judith E.
    Larschan, Erica
    Wilkinson, Gerald S.
    Valenzuela, Nicole
    Conard, Ashley Mae
    de Magalhaes, Joao Pedro
    Duan, Jingyue
    Elias, Amy E.
    Gamble, Tony
    Graze, Rita M.
    Gribble, Kristin E.
    Kreiling, Jill A.
    Riddle, Nicole C.
    [J]. AGING CELL, 2022, 21 (02)