Ultrasound may safely replace chest radiograph after tube thoracostomy removal in trauma patients

被引:4
|
作者
Miles, M. Victoria P. [1 ]
Favors, Lauren E. [1 ]
Crowder, Elizabeth [2 ]
Behrman, D. Blake [1 ]
Wilson, Andrew W. [3 ]
Harrell, Kevin N. [1 ]
Mejia, Vicente [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee Coll Med Chattanooga, Dept Surg, 979 East Third St, Suite B-401, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 1031, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med Chattanooga, Dept Orthoped Surg, 979 East Third St, Suite B-202, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2023年 / 54卷 / 01期
关键词
Tube thoracostomy; Ultrasound; Thoracostomy; Pneumothorax; Trauma;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: A chest radiograph (CXR) is routinely obtained in trauma patients following tube thora-costomy (TT) removal to assess for residual pneumothorax (PTX). New literature supports the deference of a radiograph after routine removal procedure. However, many surgeons have hesitated to adopt this practice due to concern for patient welfare and medicolegal implications. Ultrasound (US) is a portable imaging modality which may be performed rapidly, without radiation exposure, and at minimal cost. We hypothesized that transitioning from CXR to US following TT removal in trauma patients would prove safe and provide superior detection of residual PTX.Materials and Methods: A practice management guideline was established calling for the performance of a CXR and bedside US 2 h after TT removal in all adult trauma patients diagnosed with PTX at a level 1 trauma center. Surgical interns completed a 30-minute, US training course utilizing a handheld US device. US findings were interpreted and documented by the surgical interns. CXRs were interpreted by staff radiologists blinded to US findings. Data was retrospectively collected and analyzed.Results: Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Thirteen (15%) post removal PTX were identified on both US and CXR. An additional 11 (12%) PTX were identified on CXR, and 5 (6%) were identified via US, for a total of 29 PTX (33%). One patient required re-intervention; the recurrent PTX was detected by both US and CXR. For all patients, using CXR as the standard, US displayed a sensitivity of 54.2%, specificity of 92.3%, negative predictive value of 84.5%, and positive predictive value of 72.2%. The cost of care for the study cohort may have been reduced over $9,0 0 0 should US alone have been employed.Conclusion: Bedside US may be an acceptable alternative to CXR to assess for recurrent PTX following trauma TT removal.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 55
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INCIDENCE AND OUTCOME OF TUBE THORACOSTOMY POSITIONING IN TRAUMA PATIENTS
    Maybauer, Marc O.
    Geisser, Wolfgang
    Wolff, Holger
    Maybauer, Dirk M.
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 16 (02) : 237 - 241
  • [22] Prehospital chest tube thoracostomy: Effective treatment or additional trauma? (vol 59, pg 788, 2005)
    Spanjersberg, WR
    Ringburg, AN
    Bergs, EA
    Krijen, P
    Schipper, IB
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 59 (03): : 788 - 793
  • [23] The usefulness of ultrasound in the diagnosis of patients after chest trauma - two case reports
    Popiel, Agnieszka
    Siwiera, Wojciech
    Bialas, Adam Jerzy
    KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2015, 12 (04): : 372 - 376
  • [24] A thoracostomy tube guideline improves management efficiency in trauma patients
    Adrales, G
    Huynh, T
    Broering, B
    Sing, RF
    Miles, W
    Thomason, MH
    Jacobs, DG
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 52 (02): : 210 - 214
  • [25] Utility of Thoracic Computed Tomography after Blunt Trauma: When is Chest Radiograph Enough?
    Barrios, Cristobal
    Malinoski, Darren
    Dolich, Matthew
    Lekawa, Michael
    Hoyt, David
    Cinat, Marianne
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2009, 75 (10) : 966 - 969
  • [26] The value of chest radiography after chest tube removal in nonventilated trauma patients: A post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study
    Sweet, Arthur A. R.
    Kobes, Tim
    Houwert, Roderick M.
    Leenen, Luke P. H.
    de Jong, Pim A.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Ijpma, Frank F. A.
    van Baal, Mark C. P. M.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2024, 96 (04) : 623 - 627
  • [27] Effectiveness and safety of small-bore tube thoracostomy (≤20 Fr) for chest trauma patients: A retrospective observational study
    Maezawa, Toshinori
    Yanai, Machi
    Huh, Ji Young
    Ariyoshi, Koichi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (12) : 2658 - 2660
  • [28] Are Routine Chest Radiographs After Chest Tube Removal in Thoracic Surgery Patients Necessary?
    Zukowski, Monica
    Haas, Alec
    Schaefer, Eric W.
    Shen, Chan
    Reed, Michael F.
    Taylor, Matthew D.
    Go, Pauline H.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 276 : 160 - 167
  • [29] Beyond the tube: Can we reduce chest tube complications in trauma patients?
    Platnick, Carson
    Witt, Cordelie E.
    Pieracci, Fredric M.
    Robinson, Caitlin K.
    Lawless, Ryan
    Burlew, Clay Cothren
    Moore, Ernest E.
    Cohen, Mitchell
    Platnick, K. Barry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 222 (05) : 1023 - 1028
  • [30] Bedside thoracic ultrasonography of the fourth intercostal space reliably determines safe removal of tube thoracostomy after traumatic injury
    Kwan, Rita .
    Miraflor, Emily
    Yeung, Louise
    Strumwasser, Aaron
    Victorino, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 73 (06) : 1570 - 1575