Ultrasound may safely replace chest radiograph after tube thoracostomy removal in trauma patients

被引:4
|
作者
Miles, M. Victoria P. [1 ]
Favors, Lauren E. [1 ]
Crowder, Elizabeth [2 ]
Behrman, D. Blake [1 ]
Wilson, Andrew W. [3 ]
Harrell, Kevin N. [1 ]
Mejia, Vicente [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee Coll Med Chattanooga, Dept Surg, 979 East Third St, Suite B-401, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 1031, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med Chattanooga, Dept Orthoped Surg, 979 East Third St, Suite B-202, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2023年 / 54卷 / 01期
关键词
Tube thoracostomy; Ultrasound; Thoracostomy; Pneumothorax; Trauma;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: A chest radiograph (CXR) is routinely obtained in trauma patients following tube thora-costomy (TT) removal to assess for residual pneumothorax (PTX). New literature supports the deference of a radiograph after routine removal procedure. However, many surgeons have hesitated to adopt this practice due to concern for patient welfare and medicolegal implications. Ultrasound (US) is a portable imaging modality which may be performed rapidly, without radiation exposure, and at minimal cost. We hypothesized that transitioning from CXR to US following TT removal in trauma patients would prove safe and provide superior detection of residual PTX.Materials and Methods: A practice management guideline was established calling for the performance of a CXR and bedside US 2 h after TT removal in all adult trauma patients diagnosed with PTX at a level 1 trauma center. Surgical interns completed a 30-minute, US training course utilizing a handheld US device. US findings were interpreted and documented by the surgical interns. CXRs were interpreted by staff radiologists blinded to US findings. Data was retrospectively collected and analyzed.Results: Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Thirteen (15%) post removal PTX were identified on both US and CXR. An additional 11 (12%) PTX were identified on CXR, and 5 (6%) were identified via US, for a total of 29 PTX (33%). One patient required re-intervention; the recurrent PTX was detected by both US and CXR. For all patients, using CXR as the standard, US displayed a sensitivity of 54.2%, specificity of 92.3%, negative predictive value of 84.5%, and positive predictive value of 72.2%. The cost of care for the study cohort may have been reduced over $9,0 0 0 should US alone have been employed.Conclusion: Bedside US may be an acceptable alternative to CXR to assess for recurrent PTX following trauma TT removal.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 55
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is a chest radiograph indicated after chest tube removal in trauma patients? A systematic review
    Sweet, Arthur A. R.
    Beks, Reinier B.
    de Jong, Mirjam B.
    van Baal, Mark C. P.
    Ijpma, Frank F. A.
    Hietbrink, Falco
    Beeres, Frank J. P.
    Leenen, Luke P. H.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Houwert, Roderick M.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2021, 91 (02) : 427 - 434
  • [2] Is a chest radiograph after thoracostomy tube removal necessary? A cost-effective analysis
    Beattie, Genna
    Cohan, Caitlin M.
    Chomsky-Higgins, Kathryn
    Tang, Annie
    Senekjian, Lara
    Victorino, Gregory P.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 (11): : 2493 - 2499
  • [3] Thoracic Ultrasound for Detection of Pneumothorax Following Thoracostomy Tube Removal in Trauma Patients
    Robbins, Justin
    Lu, Sisi
    Hahn, Lesley
    Crayton, Corinna
    Miner, Jason
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 299 : 151 - 154
  • [4] Are Chest Radiographs or Ultrasound More Accurate in Predicting a Pneumothorax or Need for a Thoracostomy Tube in Trauma Patients?
    DeLoach, Joseph P.
    Reif, Rebecca J.
    Smedley, Westin A.
    Klutts, Garrett N.
    Bhavaraju, Avi
    Collins, Terry H.
    Kalkwarf, Kyle J.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (09) : 3751 - 3756
  • [5] Trauma patients are safe to fly 72 hours after tube thoracostomy removal
    Zonies, David
    Elterman, Joel
    Burns, Christopher
    Paul, Vincent
    Oh, John
    Cannon, Jeremy
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2018, 85 (03) : 491 - 494
  • [6] Management of chest trauma; tube thoracostomy: A feasible option
    Jat, Muhammad Ayub
    Almadawy, Abdul Mutalib
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 14 (11):
  • [7] ULTRASOUND-GUIDED CHEST TUBE THORACOSTOMY
    Stupnik, Tomaz
    Vidmar, Stanko
    Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal, 2008, 77 (03): : 225 - 228
  • [8] Prehospital chest tube thoracostomy: Effective treatment or additional trauma?
    Spanjersberg, W
    Ringburg, A
    Bergs, B
    Krijen, P
    Schipper, I
    Ringburg, AN
    Steyerberg, EW
    Edwards, MJ
    Schipper, IB
    van Vugt, AB
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 59 (01): : 96 - 101
  • [9] Thoracostomy Tube Removal in Pediatric Trauma: Film or No Film?
    Hafezi, Niloufar
    Cromeens, Barrett P.
    Morocho, Bryant S.
    Raymond, Jodi L.
    Landman, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 269 : 51 - 58
  • [10] Necessity of Routine Chest Radiograph Following Chest Tube Removal in Pediatric Patients After Cardiovascular Surgery
    Slak, Peter
    Winant, Abbey J.
    Lee, Edward Y.
    Plut, Domen
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2023, 38 (01) : 10 - 17