Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services for agriculture in the "sisal belt" of Kilosa, central Tanzania

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Puyang [1 ]
Hu, Guohua [2 ]
Turner II, B. L. [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yujia [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Landscape Ecol & Sustainabil Lab LESL, 800 Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] East China Normal Univ, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Minist Educ, 500 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, 975 S Myrtle Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, 777 E Univ Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[5] Univ Calif Riverside, Ctr Geospatial Sci, 900 Univ Ave, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Ecosystem services; Estate-smallholder nexuses; Carbon sequestration; Water yield; Landscape sustainability; Stakeholder-defined scenarios; LAND-USE; GLOBAL LAND; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; SCALE; CONSERVATION; METAANALYSIS; INVESTMENTS; PRIORITIES; SCENARIOS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-022-01584-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Exploring ways to maintain a biophysically functioning environment while improving human welfare based on competing stakeholder land uses is critical for sustainable development, especially under the context of a surging "global land rush ".Objectives This research (1) integrates different stakeholders' perceptions of human-environmental conditions and dynamics in the "sisal belt " of Kilosa, Tanzania, in terms of three alternative development visions or scenarios of land uses and covers, and (2) demonstrates the trade-offs and synergies among several ecosystem and economic outcomes at a landscape level.Methods Two spatially explicit modeling tools, Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST), are combined to assess future land-use and -cover patterns and project changes in four ecosystem services, including provisioning commodity production, under the three stakeholder-defined scenarios for the study area up to 2030.Results Each scenario had higher commodity production values relative to the baseline conditions of 2018 but lower levels of ecosystem services addressed at the level of the Kilosa sisal belt landscape. Carbon and water services may generate synergistic effects provided specific mitigation and payment mechanisms are installed. The spatial distribution of the changes in these services is projected.Conclusions Our approach provides an empirical-based platform to inform landscape management and planning. It provides a co-designed means to address possible futures of human-environmental conditions affecting sustainability, in this case for food production, resource use, poverty alleviation, and environmental conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 551
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Habitat Fragmentation Intensifies Trade-Offs between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in a Heathland Ecosystem in Southern England
    Cordingley, Justine E.
    Newton, Adrian C.
    Rose, Robert J.
    Clarke, Ralph T.
    Bullock, James M.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [12] Urban and agricultural soils: conflicts and trade-offs in the optimization of ecosystem services
    Setala, H.
    Bardgett, R. D.
    Birkhofer, K.
    Brady, M.
    Byrne, L.
    de Ruiter, P. C.
    de Vries, F. T.
    Gardi, C.
    Hedlund, K.
    Hemerik, L.
    Hotes, S.
    Liiri, M.
    Mortimer, S. R.
    Pavao-Zuckerman, M.
    Pouyat, R.
    Tsiafouli, M.
    van der Putten, W. H.
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 17 (01) : 239 - 253
  • [13] Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes
    Spyra, Marcin
    La Rosa, Daniele
    Zasada, Ingo
    Sylla, Marta
    Shkaruba, Anton
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 95
  • [14] Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 145 - 146
  • [15] Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services
    Wang, Jinnan
    Wu, Wenjun
    Yang, Meng
    Gao, Yueming
    Shao, Jiacheng
    Yang, Weishan
    Ma, Guoxia
    Yu, Fang
    Yao, Nan
    Jiang, Hongqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21
  • [16] Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices
    Kragt, Marit E.
    Robertson, Michael J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 : 147 - 157
  • [17] Balancing trade-offs between ecosystem services in Germany's forests under climate change
    Gutsch, Martin
    Lasch-Born, Petra
    Kollas, Chris
    Suckow, Felicitas
    Reyer, Christopher P. O.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [18] Economic trade-offs of harvesting the ocean twilight zone: An ecosystem services approach
    Prellezo, Raill
    Corrales, Xavier
    Andonegi, Eider
    Bald, Carlos
    -Salvador, Jose A. Fernandes
    Inarra, Bruno
    Irigoien, Xabier
    Martin, Adrian
    Murillas-Maza, Arantza
    Tasdemir, Deniz
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 67
  • [19] Trade-Offs and Optimization of Ecosystem Services in the Plain Terminal Lake Basin: A Case Study of Xinjiang
    Luo, Chun
    Ma, Xiaofei
    Yan, Wei
    Wang, Yonghui
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 35 (16) : 5043 - 5061
  • [20] Synergies and trade-offs in the management of lowland rural floodplains: an ecosystem services approach
    Rouquette, J. R.
    Posthumus, H.
    Morris, J.
    Hess, T. M.
    Dawson, Q. L.
    Gowing, D. J. G.
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2011, 56 (08): : 1566 - 1581