Science Fiction Fan Conventions as Places to Communicate Science

被引:2
作者
Childers, Gina [1 ]
Governor, Donna [2 ]
Greer, Kania [3 ]
James, Vaughan [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Coll Educ, STEM Educ, 3002 18th St, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Univ North Georgia, Coll Educ, 82 Coll Circle, Dahlonega, GA 30597 USA
[3] Georgia Southern Univ, Coll Educ, Ctr STEM Educ, 275 COE Dr,Room 3161, Statesboro, GA 30458 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Journalism & Commun, POB 118400, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Adult learning; Science fiction; Informal STEM education; Science communication; DEFICIT MODEL; SCIENTISTS; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11165-023-10130-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Science fiction conventions are places where the convergence of science fiction and science is discussed within diverse communities. Many of these science fiction conventions offer programming focused on science, often described as science tracks, for science experts to share their experiences, expertise, scientific findings, and applications related to current research in connection to science fiction with the public. Framing the study within a socio-cultural context, this study surveyed experts' (n = 19) perceived beliefs of science communication at science fiction conventions. Experts cited accessibility and promoting scientific curiosity as the greatest benefits and identified misconceptions or misinterpretation by the audience as challenges. Overall, experts agreed that communicating science is important and science fiction has a great impact on science. Because of the public access to experts, it is important to highlight the potential influence science fiction conventions may have on science communication via socio-cultural experiences and contexts within popular culture.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 166
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Informal science institutions and learning to teach: An examination of identity, agency, and affordances [J].
Adams, Jennifer D. ;
Gupta, Preeti .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2017, 54 (01) :121-138
[2]  
Aikenhead G., 2001, Science communication in theory and practice, P23, DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-0620-0_2
[3]  
American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2019, ENC SCI AM
[4]  
Bondi G. A., 2011, THESIS
[5]   Science communication reconsidered [J].
Bubela, Tania ;
Nisbet, Matthew C. ;
Borchelt, Rick ;
Brunger, Fern ;
Critchley, Cristine ;
Einsiedel, Edna ;
Geller, Gail ;
Gupta, Anil ;
Hampel, Juergen ;
Hyde-Lay, Robyn ;
Jandciu, Eric W. ;
Jones, S. Ashley ;
Kolopack, Pam ;
Lane, Summer ;
Lougheed, Tim ;
Nerlich, Brigitte ;
Ogbogu, Ubaka ;
O'Riordan, Kathleen ;
Ouellette, Colin ;
Spear, Mike ;
Strauss, Stephen ;
Thavaratnam, Thushaanthini ;
Willemse, Lisa ;
Caulfield, Timothy .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 27 (06) :514-518
[6]  
Burke KL, 2019, AM SCI, V107, P69
[7]   Science communication: a contemporary definition [J].
Burns, TW ;
O'Connor, DJ ;
Stocklmayer, SM .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (02) :183-202
[8]   Stereotypes About Gender and Science: Women ≠ Scientists [J].
Carli, Linda L. ;
Alawa, Laila ;
Lee, YoonAh ;
Zhao, Bei ;
Kim, Elaine .
PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-260
[9]  
Cheng DH, 2008, COMMUNICATING SCIENCE IN SOCIAL CONTEXTS: NEW MODELS, NEW PRACTICES, P151
[10]  
Childers G M., 2023, The Electronic Journal for Research in Science Mathematics Education, V26, P40