Experimental investigation of a multilayer detention roof for stormwater management

被引:14
作者
Alim, Mohammad A. [1 ]
Jahan, Sayka [1 ]
Rahman, Ataur [1 ]
Rahman, Mohammad Ataur [1 ]
Liebman, Mark [2 ]
Garner, Brad [3 ]
Griffith, Robert [4 ,5 ]
Griffith, Merran [6 ]
Tao, Zhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Engn Design & Built Environm, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Sustainabil Workshop, Blackheath, NSW 2785, Australia
[3] Green Roof Diagnost, Stevensburg, VA 22741 USA
[4] Evolvement Pty Ltd, Berowra, NSW 2081, Australia
[5] Knauf Insulat, Skofja Loka 4220, Slovenia
[6] Sydney Water, 1 Smith St, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia
关键词
Purple roofs; Green roofs; Stormwater management; Detention and retention; GREEN ROOF; HYDROLOGIC PERFORMANCE; RETENTION; RUNOFF; VEGETATION; CAPACITY; BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136413
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility of a multilayer detention roof, namely a purple roof, in managing urban stormwater. A purple roof is conceptually and technically different from a green roof in that the former includes a low-transmissivity drainage layer and a void layer that can be designed at various depths for the temporary storage and slow release of water. Three types of roofs, i.e., (i) traditional, (ii) green and (iii) purple, were constructed in Western Sydney, Australia. These roofs were investigated and compared in terms of runoff reduction capacity, time to start runoff and time to release the runoff. Data were collected across the period from April 2021 to May 2022. A total of 76 rainfall events were recorded during this period. It was found that the purple roof performed better than other roof systems during all the rainfall events. The purple roof delayed the median start times of runoff by 773, 211 and 86 min for small, medium and large rainfall events, respectively, compared to a traditional roof, and 110, 59 and 14 min, respectively, compared to a green roof. During small rainfall events, the purple roof retained 100% of the water on most occasions. For medium, large, and extremely large events, the median runoff volume reductions by the purple roof were 88%, 34% and 7%, and 55%, 21% and 10% than those of the traditional and green roofs, respectively. In addition to reducing the volume discharged, the purple roof took 242 and 113 min (median values) longer to discharge the stormwater compared to the traditional roof during medium and large events, respectively, and 226 and 66 min (median values) longer than the green roof. In the case of median times for extremely large events, the purple roof took 503 min longer to release stormwater than the traditional roof, and 74 min longer than the green roof. The outcomes from this study proved the technical feasibility of the purple roof technology to slow the release and reduce the volume of stormwater during different-sized rainfall events. Thus, a purple roof can potentially be used to replace the traditional detention basins in a dense urban environment to reduce flood risks.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Green roof as an effective tool for sustainable urban development: An Australian perspective in relation to stormwater and building energy management
    Alim, Mohammad A.
    Rahman, Ataur
    Tao, Zhong
    Garner, Brad
    Griffith, Robert
    Liebman, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 362
  • [2] Feasibility analysis of a small-scale rainwater harvesting system for drinking water production at Werrington, New South Wales, Australia
    Alim, Mohammad A.
    Rahman, Ataur
    Tao, Zhong
    Samali, Bijan
    Khan, Muhammad M.
    Shirin, Shafiq
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
  • [3] Water quality and quantity investigation of green roofs in a dry climate
    Beecham, S.
    Razzaghmanesh, M.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2015, 70 : 370 - 384
  • [4] BOM, 2022, Climate statistics for Australian locations
  • [5] Stormwater management impacts of small urbanising towns: The necessity of investigating the 'devil in the detail'
    Browne, Spencer
    Lintern, Anna
    Jamali, Behzad
    Leitao, Joao P.
    Bach, Peter M.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 757
  • [6] Hydrological performance of green roofs in the context of the meteorological factors during the 5-year monitoring period
    Burszta-Adamiak, Ewa
    Stanczyk, Justyna
    Lomotowski, Janusz
    [J]. WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 33 (01) : 144 - 154
  • [7] Hydrologic behavior of vegetated roofs
    Carter, Timothy L.
    Rasmussen, Todd C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2006, 42 (05): : 1261 - 1274
  • [8] Green roof substrate physical properties differ between standard laboratory tests due to differences in compaction
    Conn, Richard
    Werdin, Joerg
    Rayner, John P.
    Farrell, Claire
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 261
  • [9] Cristiano E., 2022, HYDROL RES, V53, P1129
  • [10] The hydrological performance of a green roof in Sydney, Australia: A tale of two towers
    Fleck, R.
    Westerhausen, M. T.
    Killingsworth, N.
    Ball, J.
    Torpy, F. R.
    Irga, P. J.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 221