Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technique and initial outcomes

被引:8
作者
Tang, Ya-Chun [1 ,2 ]
Cheung, Yun-Chung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent, Linkou Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Med Coll Chang Gung Univ, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent, 5 Fuxing St, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM); mammography; breast cancer; biopsy; diagnosis; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MRI; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.21037/qims-23-137
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy (CEM-Bx), a novel technique for diagnosing suspicious enhanced lesions, was commercialized for clinical application in 2021; however, there are only a few publications documenting this technique in the existing literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the procedural performance and preliminary outcomes of CEM-Bx performed in our hospital between from September 2021 to June 2022. We reviewed data of 12 women who underwent CEM-Bx during the study period, including their demographic and procedural characteristics, biopsy success rate, histopathological diagnosis, and average glandular dose (AGD). All women (mean age +/- standard deviation: 54 +/- 6 years) showed enhanced breast lesions on CEM and underwent CEM-Bx within one week. The success rate of CEM-Bx was 100%. The vertical needle approach was used in a decubitus position (N=7, 58%), while the horizontal needle approach was used in an upright sitting position (N=5, 42%). The mean procedure time for the CEM-Bx was 17 +/- 6.3 min. The mean AGD was 14.3 +/- 12.3 mGy. Histopathologic examination revealed a malignancy rate of 66.7%. In summary, CEM-Bx is a feasible technique, with a high success rate of diagnosing contract-enhanced lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:5349 / 5354
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes [J].
Alcantara, R. ;
Posso, M. ;
Pitarch, M. ;
Arenas, N. ;
Ejarque, B. ;
Iotti, V ;
Besutti, G. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (01) :417-428
[2]   Comparison of radiation dose between 2D digital stereotactic versus digital breast tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsies [J].
Amir, T. ;
Zuckerman, S. P. ;
Barufaldi, B. ;
Maidment, A. D. ;
Conant, E. F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 134
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1960, AMER J ROENTGENOL RA, V83, P372
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, FED REGISTER, V64, P13590
[5]   A case report of breast cancer in silicone-injected breasts diagnosed by an emerging technique of contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy [J].
Cheung, Yun-Chung ;
Kuo, Wen-Lin ;
Lee, Li-Yu ;
Tang, Ya-Chun .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[6]   Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis [J].
Cheung, Yun-Chung ;
Lin, Yu-Ching ;
Wan, Yung-Liang ;
Yeow, Kee-Min ;
Huang, Pei-Chin ;
Lo, Yung-Feng ;
Tsai, Hsiu-Pei ;
Ueng, Shir-Hwa ;
Chang, Chee-Jen .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) :2394-2403
[7]  
DOrsi C. J., 2013, ACR BI-RADS Mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS Atlas, P1
[8]   Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation [J].
Fallenberg, Eva M. ;
Schmitzberger, Florian F. ;
Amer, Heba ;
Ingold-Heppner, Barbara ;
Balleyguier, Corinne ;
Diekmann, Felix ;
Engelken, Florian ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
Renz, Diane M. ;
Bick, Ulrich ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Dromain, Clarisse .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (07) :2752-2764
[9]   Radiation Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Two-Center Prospective Comparison [J].
Gennaro, Gisella ;
Cozzi, Andrea ;
Schiaffino, Simone ;
Sardanelli, Francesco ;
Caumo, Francesca .
CANCERS, 2022, 14 (07)
[10]   Outcome of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy [J].
Han, Boo-Kyung ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Orel, Susan G. ;
Rosen, Mark .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (06) :1798-1804