Do ESG ratings promote corporate green innovation? A quasi-natural experiment based on SynTao Green Finance?s ESG ratings

被引:432
作者
Wang, Juxian [1 ]
Ma, Mengdi [2 ]
Dong, Tianyi [3 ,5 ]
Zhang, Zheyuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Sch Business, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Business Sch, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[4] Renmin Univ China, Sch Lab & Human Resources, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Room 610,Comprehens Bldg,33 Fucheng Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ESG rating; Green innovation; Investor monitoring; Management incentive; Information asymmetry; AGENCY COSTS; DETERMINANTS; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENT; INCENTIVES; GOVERNANCE; IMPACT; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102623
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Corporate efforts in green technology improvements are critical for enhancing sustainability; consequently, how to promote green innovation has attracted scholarly attention. This study explores whether and how environment, social, and governance (ESG) ratings influence corporate green innovation by using an independent thirdparty rating agency's (SynTao Green Finance) ESG ratings in China as a quasi-natural experiment. We find companies covered by the ESG rating agency significantly increase green innovation output by 3.9%, mainly as an increase in green invention patents. ESG ratings' positive effects on green innovation are more pronounced for firms whose investors are less short-sighted, non-state-owned enterprises and firms with higher degree of financial constraints. Additionally, we find ESG ratings' impact can also increase the green innovation quality and synergetic green innovation. Thus, ESG ratings from third-party institutions can effectively increase corporate green innovation, which has important implications for companies to achieve green transformation and for emerging markets to improve ESG rating systems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[2]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[3]   Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation [J].
Ahuja, Gautam ;
Lampert, Curba Morris ;
Tandon, Vivek .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2008, 2 :1-98
[4]   Inter-firm R&D collaborations and green innovation value: The role of family firms' involvement and the moderating effects of proximity dimensions [J].
Ardito, Lorenzo ;
Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni ;
Pascucci, Federica ;
Peruffo, Enzo .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (01) :185-197
[5]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[6]   Market Orientation, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Business Performance [J].
Ben Brik, Anis ;
Rettab, Belaid ;
Mellahi, Kamel .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 99 (03) :307-324
[7]   I don't Want to be Green: Prosocial Motivation Effects on Firm Environmental Innovation Rejection Decisions [J].
Bendell, Bari L. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 143 (02) :277-288
[8]   Does Going Public Affect Innovation? [J].
Bernstein, Shai .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2015, 70 (04) :1364-1403
[9]   Necessity as the mother of "green' inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Fosfuri, Andrea ;
Gelabert, Liliana ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (08) :891-909
[10]   Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (05) :1043-1075