Readability of Online Information on the Latarjet Procedure

被引:1
|
作者
Ahmed, Aathir [1 ]
Jassim, Sarmed [2 ]
Karkuri, Ahmed [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Orthopaed, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Sligo Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Sligo, Ireland
关键词
sports surgery; health literacy; readability; latarjet procedure; orthopaedics; BANKART REPAIR; SHOULDER;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.49184
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionA common complication of first-time or recurrent shoulder dislocations is bone loss at the humeral head and glenoid. Recurrent shoulder instability is often a result of bony defects in the glenoid following shoulder dislocations. In the setting of glenoid bone loss, surgical interventions are generally required to restore stability. The Latarjet procedure is a challenging operation and, due to its complexity, may be associated with operative complications. It can be difficult to explain the procedure to patients in a manner that is easily comprehensible, which may lead to confusion or being overwhelmed with information. Hence, it is important that the information available to patients is easily accessible and perceivable to allow for adequate health literacy. Health literacy is defined as the ability to make health decisions in the context of everyday life. MethodsThe search engines Google and Bing were accessed on a single day in the month of July 2023, searching the terms "Latarjet surgery" and "Latarjet procedure." For each term on both search engines, the first three pages were evaluated, resulting in a total of 114 websites for review. Out of these, 25 websites met the inclusion criteria and underwent further in-depth analysis through the online readability software, WEB FX. This software generated a Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and a Reading Grade Level (RGL) for each website. ResultsIn our study, the mean FRES was 50.3 (SD +/- 12.5), categorizing the data as 'fairly difficult to read.' The mean RGL score was 8.12 (SD +/- 2.35), which exceeds the recommended target.ConclusionIn conclusion, the results of this study have demonstrated that the material available on the Internet about the Latarjet procedure is above the recommended readability levels for the majority of the population. Our findings align with similar studies assessing the readability of online patient information. Based on these findings, physicians should provide patients with vetted information to facilitate a better understanding of the procedure, thereby enabling patients to make more informed decisions regarding their health.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis
    Burhan Fatih Kocyigit
    Tuba Tulay Koca
    Mazlum Serdar Akaltun
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2019, 38 : 3269 - 3274
  • [22] Disparities between English and Spanish in readability of online endodontic information for laypeople
    Miguens-Vila, Ramon
    Ledesma-Ludi, Yanina
    Rodriguez-Lozano, Francisco
    Varela-Centelles, Pablo
    Seoane-Romero, Juan M.
    Castelo-Baz, Pablo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 149 (11) : 960 - 966
  • [23] Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review
    Daraz, Lubna
    Morrow, Allison S.
    Ponce, Oscar J.
    Farah, Wigdan
    Katabi, Abdulrahman
    Majzoub, Abdul
    Seisa, Mohamed O.
    Benkhadra, Raed
    Alsawas, Mouaz
    Larry, Prokop
    Murad, M. Hassan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2018, 33 (05) : 487 - 492
  • [24] Readability, accountability, and quality of burns first aid information available online
    Baldwin, Alexander J.
    BURNS, 2023, 49 (08) : 1823 - 1832
  • [25] Impingement on the internet: evaluating the quality and readability of online subacromial impingement information
    Erian, Christopher
    Erian, Michael
    Raniga, Sumit
    BMJ OPEN SPORT & EXERCISE MEDICINE, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [26] Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device
    Rouhi, Armaun D.
    Han, Jason J.
    Ghanem, Yazid K.
    Pervaiz, Sahir S.
    Suarez-Pierre, Alejandro
    Choudhury, Rashikh A.
    Bermudez, Christian A.
    Williams, Noel N.
    Dumon, Kristoffel R.
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2023, 47 (06) : 1029 - 1037
  • [27] Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Basch, Corey H.
    Ethan, Danna
    MacLean, Sarah A.
    Fera, Joseph
    Garcia, Phillip
    Basch, Charles E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2018, 12 (05) : 1665 - 1669
  • [28] Readability and Quality of Microtia Online Information by Large Organizations in English and Spanish
    Berrios, Adriana I. Baez
    Goncalves, Stefania
    Perez, Enrique
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2025,
  • [29] Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information
    Cheng, Christina
    Dunn, Matthew
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 39 (04) : 309 - 314
  • [30] Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information
    Broderick, James M.
    McCarthy, Andrea
    Hogan, Niall
    KNEE, 2021, 28 : 139 - 150