The politics of vaccination: a closer look at the beliefs, social norms, and prevention behaviors related to COVID-19 vaccine uptake within two US political parties

被引:1
作者
Konstantopoulos, Arianna [1 ,2 ]
Dayton, Lauren [1 ]
Latkin, Carl [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Political party; politics; COVID-19; vaccine uptake; vaccine hesitancy; beliefs; social norms; prevention behaviors;
D O I
10.1080/13548506.2023.2283401
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and suboptimal vaccine uptake rates are pressing public health challenges. Vaccine hesitancy has been observed for different vaccines. For COVID-19 vaccines, multiple factors influence vaccine uptake in the U.S. including political ideology. A more nuanced understanding of the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake within political parties is needed. This study assesses the relationship between known vaccine hesitancy factors and vaccine uptake within two major political parties. Data from 804 U.S. participants in an online survey from June 2021 was used to assess the association between COVID-19 vaccine uptake (no dose vs. any dose) and categories of factors thought to influence vaccine uptake (sociodemographic variables, COVID-19 disease and vaccine belief variables, belief in COVID-19 prevention behavior variables, and social network features variables) for Republicans and Democrats using bivariate and multivariate regression. 65.4% of the sample reported having received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (22.6% Republican and 52.1% Democrat). In the total sample bivariate model, Democrat participants had significantly greater odds of having received a dose of the vaccine as compared to Republican participants (OR = 2.51, 95%CI = 1.73-3.64). In adjusted models, the speed of vaccine development was negatively associated with vaccine uptake for both Republicans (aOR = 0.18, 95%CI = 0.06-0.57) and Democrats (aOR = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.19-0.86), as was concern about side effects from the vaccine (Republicans: aOR = 0.15; 95%CI = 0.05-0.47; Democrats: aOR = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.06-0.31). COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Republicans, but not Democrats, was associated with belief that the vaccine prevents COVID-19 (aOR = 3.29, 95%CI = 1.29-8.37) and belief about friends' vaccine intentions (aOR = 6.19, 95%CI = 2.39-16.05). There were no significant factors unique to Democrats. Concerns about aspects of COVID-19 vaccine safety for both political groups suggest that vaccine advocacy interventions should universally address these factors. However, Republican beliefs in vaccine efficacy and in friends' vaccine intentions suggest a need for Republican-specific messaging.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 602
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Socioeconomic privilege and political ideology are associated with racial disparity in COVID-19 vaccination
    Agarwal, Ritu
    Dugas, Michelle
    Ramaprasad, Jui
    Luo, Junjie
    Li, Gujie
    Gao, Guodong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (33)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, CDC COVID 19 STUD SH
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, Ten threats to global health in 2019
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, Coronavirus (COVID- 19) Update: FDA Authorizes Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of COVID-19
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, REM PRES BID COVID 1
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2022, ORD WEAR FAC MASKS W
  • [8] Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Type and Adverse Effects Following Vaccination
    Beatty, Alexis L.
    Peyser, Noah D.
    Butcher, Xochitl E.
    Cocohoba, Jennifer M.
    Lin, Feng
    Olgin, Jeffrey E.
    Pletcher, Mark J.
    Marcus, Gregory M.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (12)
  • [9] Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
    Berinsky, Adam J.
    Huber, Gregory A.
    Lenz, Gabriel S.
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) : 351 - 368
  • [10] Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples
    Chandler, Jesse
    Shapiro, Danielle
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 12, 2016, 12 : 53 - 81