Trade and welfare effects of export tax: Theory and evidence from China's incomplete export VAT rebate

被引:1
作者
Bond, Eric W. [1 ]
Duan, Yuwan [2 ]
Ji, Ting [2 ]
Lu, Yi [3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Econ, VU Stn B 351819,2301 Vanderbilt Pl, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ CUFE, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 30 Shuangqing Rd, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Export value-added tax rebate; Tariff; General equilibrium model; Input-output linkage; Optimal export tax; TARIFF STRUCTURE; POLICY; PERFORMANCE; RESTRICTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; ACCESSION; GRAVITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2023.08.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While China was reducing tariffs as part of the WTO accession process, it was also effectively restricting exports in some sectors by reducing the rebates of the value added tax (VAT) for exporters. We use a multi-country multi-sector Ricardian model to examine the extent to which these de facto export tax changes have benefited China and nullified the benefits to the rest of the world of China's trade liberalization. We show that trade liberalization benefited China's trading partners both through an improvement in their terms of trade and through a reallocation of resources from protected imported sectors to exportable sectors. We find that the partial rebate policy of VAT on exports provided a small effect overall on the welfare of China and its trading partners, although some countries lost as much as 2/3 of their gains from China's trade liberalization based on tariffs alone. By solving for China's optimal export taxes, we demonstrate that while certain sectors experienced a movement towards the optimal level of export taxes, others deviated from it. This differential adjustment contributed to the limited welfare effect on China. Interestingly, our results indicate that the export tax policies favored downstream sectors within China.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 560
页数:19
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Where is the value added? Trade liberalization and production networks [J].
Aichele, Rahel ;
Heiland, Inga .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 115 :130-144
[2]   How did China's WTO entry affect US prices? [J].
Amiti, Mary ;
Dai, Mi ;
Feenstra, Robert C. ;
Romalis, John .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 126
[3]   Regional effects of export tax rebate on exporting firms: Evidence from China [J].
An, L. ;
Hu, C. ;
Tan, Yong .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 25 (04) :774-798
[4]   Welfare versus market access: The implications of tariff structure for tariff reform [J].
Anderson, James E. ;
Neary, J. Peter .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 71 (01) :187-205
[5]  
Antràs P, 2019, ROUT ERIA ST DEVELOP, P126
[6]   Measuring the Upstreamness of Production and Trade Flows [J].
Antras, Pol ;
Chor, Davin ;
Fally, Thibault ;
Hillberry, Russell .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (03) :412-416
[7]   New Trade Models, Same Old Gains? [J].
Arkolakis, Costas ;
Costinot, Arnaud ;
Rodriguez-Clare, Andres .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :94-130
[8]   The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States [J].
Autor, David H. ;
Dorn, David ;
Hanson, Gordon H. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (06) :2121-2168
[9]   Quantitative Analysis of Multiparty Tariff Negotiations [J].
Bagwell, Kyle ;
Staiger, Robert W. ;
Yurukoglu, Ali .
ECONOMETRICA, 2021, 89 (04) :1595-1631
[10]   What Do Trade Negotiators Negotiate About? Empirical Evidence from the World Trade Organization [J].
Bagwell, Kyle ;
Staiger, Robert W. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (04) :1238-1273