Upper-level wind mode over the North Atlantic-Arctic Ocean leading to coherent variations of Eurasian and North American winter temperatures and weakness in the CMIP6 models

被引:0
作者
Sun, Chenghu [1 ]
Shi, Xiaohui [1 ]
Lu, Qifeng [2 ]
Li, Weijing [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] China Meteorol Adm, Ctr Earth Syst Modeling & Predict, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
CMIP6; Eurasia; North America; upper-level wind mode; winter surface air temperature; INDIAN-SUMMER MONSOON; TELECONNECTION; VARIABILITY; PATTERN; PROPAGATION; STATIONARY; SIMULATION; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1002/joc.8335
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This study discovers that the interannual synchronization of winter temperature anomalies between northern Eurasia and North America is closely related to variation in the second leading mode of the 300 hPa meridional wind anomalies (i.e., V300-EOF2) over the North Atlantic-Arctic Ocean. The V300-EOF2 mode modulates the large-scale Rossby wave propagating across the mid-high latitudes of the Eurasian and North American continents at the mid-high level of troposphere, and it also interferes with the climatological quasi-stationary wavenumber-2 to affect the stratosphere circulation, which facilitates the southward intrusion of cold air into Eurasia and North America simultaneously. This study also evaluated whether the CMIP6 high-top (HT) models could more accurately represent the V300-EOF2 mode and the associated modulation mechanism on synchronized temperature variation between Eurasia and North America than the low-top (LT) models. The results demonstrate that although the multi-model ensemble means (MME) of both the HT and LT models can reproduce the V300-EOF mode, they all underestimate its modulation mechanism on atmospheric circulation and coherent temperature changes over mid-latitude Eurasia and North America, with minor differences in simulation skill capability. Most importantly, although containing a full stratosphere, the HT models do not significantly improve their simulation ability to depict the observed linear interference between the anomalous wave-2 and the climatological stationary wave-2 compared to the LT models. Therefore, comparing to the LT models, the CMIP6 HT models present no clear advantages in reproducing the V300-EOF2 mode and its associated low-frequency climate anomalies. These results also have implications for the evaluation of the predictability of concomitant Eurasian-North American cooling in the Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Prediction Project.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 447
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Is There Any Improvement in Simulation of the Wintertime Western Pacific Teleconnection Pattern and Associated Climate Anomalies in CMIP6 Compared to CMIP5 Models? [J].
Aru, Hasi ;
Chen, Wen ;
Chen, Shangfeng .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (22) :8841-8861
[2]   Can an ensemble climate simulation be used to separate climate change signals from internal unforced variability? [J].
Bengtsson, L. ;
Hodges, K. I. .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 52 (5-6) :3553-3573
[3]  
Bretherton CS, 1999, J CLIMATE, V12, P1990, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1990:TENOSD>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   PROPAGATION OF PLANETARY-SCALE DISTURBANCES FROM LOWER INTO UPPER ATMOSPHERE [J].
CHARNEY, JG ;
DRAZIN, PG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1961, 66 (01) :83-+
[6]   Cloud and Water Vapor Feedbacks to the El Nino Warming: Are They Still Biased in CMIP5 Models? [J].
Chen, Lin ;
Yu, Yongqiang ;
Sun, De-Zheng .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (14) :4947-4961
[7]   The Eurasian Jet Streams as Conduits for East Asian Monsoon Variability [J].
Chowdary, Jasti S. ;
Hu, Kaiming ;
Srinivas, G. ;
Kosaka, Yu ;
Wang, Lin ;
Rao, K. Koteswara .
CURRENT CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTS, 2019, 5 (03) :233-244
[8]   Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects [J].
Deser, C. ;
Lehner, F. ;
Rodgers, K. B. ;
Ault, T. ;
Delworth, T. L. ;
DiNezio, P. N. ;
Fiore, A. ;
Frankignoul, C. ;
Fyfe, J. C. ;
Horton, D. E. ;
Kay, J. E. ;
Knutti, R. ;
Lovenduski, N. S. ;
Marotzke, J. ;
McKinnon, K. A. ;
Minobe, S. ;
Randerson, J. ;
Screen, J. A. ;
Simpson, I. R. ;
Ting, M. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (04) :277-+
[9]   Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability [J].
Deser, Clara ;
Phillips, Adam ;
Bourdette, Vincent ;
Teng, Haiyan .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2012, 38 (3-4) :527-546
[10]   Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization [J].
Eyring, Veronika ;
Bony, Sandrine ;
Meehl, Gerald A. ;
Senior, Catherine A. ;
Stevens, Bjorn ;
Stouffer, Ronald J. ;
Taylor, Karl E. .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 9 (05) :1937-1958