Advancing industrial wastewater treatment through comprehensive evaluation and innovative technology: a G1-entropy improved TOPSIS model approach

被引:3
作者
Yu, Xin [1 ]
Suntrayuth, Sid [2 ]
Carayannis, Elias G. [3 ]
Sindakis, Stavros [1 ,4 ]
Showkat, Saloome [5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Natl Res Base Intelligent Mfg Serv, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Inst Dev Adm, Int Coll, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Business, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[4] Hellen Open Univ, Sch Social Sci, 18 Aristotelous St, Patras 26335, Greece
[5] Inst Strategy Entrepreneurship & Educ Growth, Athens, Greece
关键词
Industrial sewage treatment projects; Comprehensive evaluation; G1-entropy; TOPSIS model; Sustainable development; China; O32; DECISION-MAKING; SEWAGE-TREATMENT; EFFICIENCY EVALUATION; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT PLANTS; SELECTION; QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; ENTROPY; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-023-10032-y
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study proposes a comprehensive evaluation system for industrial sewage treatment projects based on the G1-Entropy Improved TOPSIS model to accurately quantify and objectively evaluate such projects. A comprehensive evaluation index system is constructed based on four levels: environmental, economic, managerial, and social. G1-entropy is used to revise the empirical results of experts and improve the accuracy and practicality of evaluation index weight. The study's feasibility and practicality are demonstrated through the evaluation of a sewage treatment project by Q City Water Group Co., Ltd. in China. The research on multi-attribute decision-making is crucial, especially as stakeholders are increasingly involved in decision-making issues. Environmental problems, particularly water pollution, have become increasingly severe, necessitating the scientific evaluation of sewage treatment projects to improve living standards and promote social sustainability. This study proposes a comprehensive evaluation system and applies the G1-entropy improved TOPSIS model to determine an objective and accurate evaluation index weight. The improved TOPSIS method simplifies the calculation process, making it more efficient and practical. This study's technological implications are significant, as it presents a novel and efficient approach for evaluating sewage treatment projects. The proposed system and model can provide technical support and decision-making guidance for the operation and management of sewage treatment projects, thus enhancing their efficiency and effectiveness. Additionally, the study's practical implications are important for promoting the sustainable development of environmental projects and enterprises. The proposed evaluation system can improve the quality of life for residents and promote the sustainable development of society.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [1] Human domination of the global water cycle absent from depictions and perceptions
    Abbott, Benjamin W.
    Bishop, Kevin
    Zarnetske, Jay P.
    Minaudo, Camille
    Chapin, F. S., III
    Krause, Stefan
    Hannah, David M.
    Conner, Lafe
    Ellison, David
    Godsey, Sarah E.
    Plont, Stephen
    Marcais, Jean
    Kolbe, Tamara
    Huebner, Amanda
    Frei, Rebecca J.
    Hampton, Tyler
    Gu, Sen
    Buhman, Madeline
    Sayedi, Sayedeh Sara
    Ursache, Ovidiu
    Chapin, Melissa
    Henderson, Kathryn D.
    Pinay, Gilles
    [J]. NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2019, 12 (07) : 533 - +
  • [2] A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
    Abdar, Moloud
    Pourpanah, Farhad
    Hussain, Sadiq
    Rezazadegan, Dana
    Liu, Li
    Ghavamzadeh, Mohammad
    Fieguth, Paul
    Cao, Xiaochun
    Khosravi, Abbas
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    Makarenkov, Vladimir
    Nahavandi, Saeid
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2021, 76 : 243 - 297
  • [3] Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach
    Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier
    Ortiz-de-Mandojana, Natalia
    [J]. ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (04) : 365 - 385
  • [4] Ahuja S., 2021, Handbook of water purity and quality, VSecond, P19, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-821057-4.00003-3
  • [5] Efficiency Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Plants Through Interval Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case Study in Turkey
    Aksac, Selin
    Ulukan, H. Ziya
    [J]. INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS: DIGITAL ACCELERATION AND THE NEW NORMAL, INFUS 2022, VOL 2, 2022, 505 : 208 - 215
  • [6] Different stakeholders' opinions toward the sustainability of common textile wastewater treatment technologies in Turkey: A Case study Istanbul province
    Al Sawaf, Mohamad Basel
    Karaca, Ferhat
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 42 : 194 - 205
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2007, Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781849773799
  • [8] Antonelli Cristiano., 2006, J Technol Transf, V31, P211, DOI [10.1007/s10961-005-6107-y, DOI 10.1007/S10961-005-6107-Y]
  • [9] The effect of Industrial and Sewage discharges on the quality of receiving waters and human health, Riyadh City -Saudi Arabia
    Badr, Nadia B. E.
    Al-Qahtani, Khairia M.
    Alflaij, Sahab O.
    Al-Qahtani, Salma F.
    Al-Saad, Mohammed A.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF AQUATIC RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (02) : 116 - 122
  • [10] Freshwater availability status across countries for human and ecosystem needs
    Baggio, Guilherme
    Qadir, Manzoor
    Smakhtin, Vladimir
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 792