Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Sahrmann, P. [1 ]
Naenni, N. [2 ]
Jung, R. E. [2 ]
Hammerle, C. H. F. [2 ]
Attin, T. [3 ]
Schmidlin, P. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Univ Ctr Dent Med, Clin Periodontol Endodontol & Cariol, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Plattenstr 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
single-tooth dental implants; marginal bone level; dental radiography; alveolar bone loss; clinical research; peri-implantitis; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; LONG IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL; SUCCESS; CROWNS; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; PERIOD;
D O I
10.1177/00220345231170538
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of short dental implants (6-mm test group, TG) to longer implants (10-mm control group, CG) with single crown restorations after 10 y of loading. Patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the posterior jaws were randomly assigned to TG or CG. Implants were loaded with screw-retained single crowns after a healing period of 10 wk. Follow-up appointments were scheduled yearly and comprised patient-adapted oral hygiene reinstructions and polishing of all teeth and implants. After 10 y, clinical and radiographical parameters were assessed again. Out of initially 94 patients (47 in TG and CG, each), 70 (36 TG and 34 CG) could be reassessed. Survival rates accounted for 85.7% (TG) and 97.1% (CG), without significant intergroup difference (P = 0.072). All but 1 lost implant had been located in the lower jaw. These implants were not lost due to peri-implantitis but due to a late loss of osseointegration without signs of inflammation and with actually stable marginal bone levels (MBLs) over the investigation period. In general, MBLs were stable with medians (interquartile ranges) of 0.13 (0.78) mm and 0.08 (1.2) mm, for TG and CG, without significant intergroup differences. Crown-to-implant ratio showed a highly significant intergroup difference of 1.06 & PLUSMN; 0.18 mm and 0.73 & PLUSMN; 0.17 mm (P < 0.001). Few technical complications (i.e., screw loosening or chipping) were registered during the investigation period. In conclusion, given stringent professional maintenance, short dental implants with single-crown restorations show a slightly worse but statistically not different survival rate after 10 y, especially in the lower jaw, but can still be considered a valuable alternative, especially when vertical bone dimensions are limited (German Clinical Trials Registry: DRKS00006290).
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1021
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A retrospective evaluation of 1,387 single-tooth implants: A 6-year follow-up
    Levin, Liran
    Sadet, Paul
    Grossmann, Yoav
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (12) : 2080 - 2083
  • [32] Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function
    Sailer, Irena
    Zembic, Anja
    Jung, Ronald Ernst
    Siegenthaler, David
    Holderegger, Claudia
    Haemmerle, Christoph Hans Franz
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [33] Immediate Single-Tooth Implant Placement in Bony Defects in the Esthetic Zone: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial
    Slagter, Kirsten W.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Bakker, Nicolaas A.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (06) : 619 - 629
  • [34] A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant-supported single-tooth restorations
    Hosseini, Mandana
    Worsaae, Nils
    Schiodt, Morten
    Gotfredsen, Klaus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2011, 4 (04) : 347 - 361
  • [35] A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region
    Hosseini, Mandana
    Worsaae, Nils
    Gotfredsen, Klaus
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (08) : 792 - 803
  • [36] Long-term performance of implants with moderately rough anodized surface supporting single-tooth restorations: A retrospective analysis with an up to 15-year follow-up
    Kowar, Jan
    Lund, Henrik
    Stenport, Victoria Franke
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (04) : 367 - 377
  • [37] A Randomized Clinical Trial of Monolithic Single-Tooth Crowns: 1-Year Preliminary Results
    Deniz, Diler
    Aktas, Guliz
    Guncu, Mustafa Baris
    Guncu, Guliz Nigar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2023, 36 (04) : 426 - 435
  • [38] 6 mm vs 10 m-long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior jaws: A 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial
    Storelli, Stefano
    Abba, Alessandra
    Scanferla, Massimo
    Botticelli, Daniele
    Romeo, Eugenio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2018, 11 (03) : 283 - 292
  • [39] Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single-Tooth Scalloped Implants and Digitally Customized Restorations: A 5-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level
    Berberi, Antoine N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2024, 39 (06) : 884 - 892
  • [40] Randomized controlled pilot study assessing efficacy, efficiency, and patient-reported outcomes measures of chairside and labside single-tooth restorations
    Zuercher, Anina N.
    Ioannidis, Alexis
    Husler, Jurg
    Mehl, Albert
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 35 (01) : 74 - 83