Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Sahrmann, P. [1 ]
Naenni, N. [2 ]
Jung, R. E. [2 ]
Hammerle, C. H. F. [2 ]
Attin, T. [3 ]
Schmidlin, P. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Univ Ctr Dent Med, Clin Periodontol Endodontol & Cariol, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Plattenstr 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
single-tooth dental implants; marginal bone level; dental radiography; alveolar bone loss; clinical research; peri-implantitis; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; LONG IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL; SUCCESS; CROWNS; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; PERIOD;
D O I
10.1177/00220345231170538
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of short dental implants (6-mm test group, TG) to longer implants (10-mm control group, CG) with single crown restorations after 10 y of loading. Patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the posterior jaws were randomly assigned to TG or CG. Implants were loaded with screw-retained single crowns after a healing period of 10 wk. Follow-up appointments were scheduled yearly and comprised patient-adapted oral hygiene reinstructions and polishing of all teeth and implants. After 10 y, clinical and radiographical parameters were assessed again. Out of initially 94 patients (47 in TG and CG, each), 70 (36 TG and 34 CG) could be reassessed. Survival rates accounted for 85.7% (TG) and 97.1% (CG), without significant intergroup difference (P = 0.072). All but 1 lost implant had been located in the lower jaw. These implants were not lost due to peri-implantitis but due to a late loss of osseointegration without signs of inflammation and with actually stable marginal bone levels (MBLs) over the investigation period. In general, MBLs were stable with medians (interquartile ranges) of 0.13 (0.78) mm and 0.08 (1.2) mm, for TG and CG, without significant intergroup differences. Crown-to-implant ratio showed a highly significant intergroup difference of 1.06 & PLUSMN; 0.18 mm and 0.73 & PLUSMN; 0.17 mm (P < 0.001). Few technical complications (i.e., screw loosening or chipping) were registered during the investigation period. In conclusion, given stringent professional maintenance, short dental implants with single-crown restorations show a slightly worse but statistically not different survival rate after 10 y, especially in the lower jaw, but can still be considered a valuable alternative, especially when vertical bone dimensions are limited (German Clinical Trials Registry: DRKS00006290).
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1021
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Immediate Loading and Delayed Loading of Single-Tooth Implants: 5-Year Results
    Gjelvold, Bjorn
    Kisch, Jeno
    Chrcanovic, Bruno R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (05) : 1 - 9
  • [22] Short (6-mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (10-mm) dental implants: a randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up
    Bechara, Souheil
    Kubilius, Ricardas
    Veronesi, Giovanni
    Pires, Jefferson T.
    Shibli, Jamil A.
    Mangano, Francesco G.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (09) : 1097 - 1107
  • [23] Immediate single-tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10-year randomized controlled trial
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Slagter, Kirsten W.
    Gareb, Barzi
    Hentenaar, Diederik F. M.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2025, 96 (02) : 151 - 163
  • [24] Single-Tooth Implants with Different Neck Designs: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Aesthetic Outcome
    den Hartog, Laurens
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Slater, James J. Huddleston
    Stellingsma, Kees
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (03) : 311 - 321
  • [26] Clinical evaluation of submerged and non-submerged implants for posterior single-tooth replacements: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial
    Nemli, S. K.
    Gungor, M. B.
    Aydin, C.
    Yilmaz, H.
    Turkcan, I.
    Demirkoprulu, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (12) : 1484 - 1492
  • [27] Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants
    Collis, N
    Coleman, D
    Foo, ITH
    Sharpe, DT
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (04) : 786 - 791
  • [28] Immediate Single-Tooth Implant Placement in Bony Defects in the Esthetic Zone: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial
    Slagter, Kirsten W.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Bakker, Nicolaas A.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (06) : 619 - 629
  • [29] Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function
    Sailer, Irena
    Zembic, Anja
    Jung, Ronald Ernst
    Siegenthaler, David
    Holderegger, Claudia
    Haemmerle, Christoph Hans Franz
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [30] A 5-year prospective clinical trial on short implants (6 mm) for single tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla: immediate versus delayed loading
    Mustafa Ayna
    Bastian Wessing
    Ralf Gutwald
    Andreas Neff
    Thomas Ziebart
    Yahya Açil
    Jörg Wiltfang
    Aydin Gülses
    Odontology, 2019, 107 : 244 - 253