Intrauterine Device Complications and Their Management

被引:7
作者
Myo, Melissa G. [1 ]
Nguyen, Brian T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Family Planning, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
IUD complications; IUD expulsion; IUD perforation; IUD fragmentation; IUD breakage; IUD complication management; PELVIC-INFLAMMATORY-DISEASE; UTERINE PERFORATION; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; RISK-FACTORS; INSERTION; FAILURE; CONTRACEPTION; EFFICACY; PARITY;
D O I
10.1007/s13669-023-00357-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of ReviewIndividuals are using intrauterine devices (IUDs) increasingly more frequently not only for contraception and emergency contraception, but also, in the case of hormonal IUDs, for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding and endometrial hyperplasia. While IUD complications are rare, their increasing prevalence is inevitably linked to more patients requiring specialized care for these complications. This review summarizes the most common complications, inclusive of perforation, expulsion, concurrent pregnancy, and difficult IUD removal, as well as their management strategies.Recent FindingsThe two most recent, large-scale, multi-site cohort studies examining IUD complications were conducted in Europe (European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices (EURAS-IUD)) and the USA (Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Devices (APEX-IUD)), confirming the rarity of perforations, occurring in less than 0.5% of individuals over 5 years of follow-up and primarily at the time of or soon after insertion. These studies both confirmed the independent and increased risk of perforation among individuals receiving an IUD in the postpartum state, as well as among breastfeeding individuals. In the APEX-IUD study, the risk of perforation was noted to be elevated even up to 52 weeks postpartum, even when controlling for breastfeeding status. The same study also noted that 10.7% of individuals receiving IUDs within 3 days postpartum expelled their IUDs; while this proportion was significantly elevated compared to those waiting several weeks to receive their IUD, it is remarkably lower than rates seen in previous studies of immediate postpartum IUD insertion. Breastfeeding was protective against IUD expulsion. Additional studies note the incidence of IUD fragmentation and possible differences for rates of fragmentation by device type.SummaryIUD complications are generally rare but can become serious or burdensome for patients if their reproductive healthcare providers are not aware of the possible risks and presentation. Understanding the potential for IUDs to perforate the uterus, be expelled, fail to prevent pregnancy, or be difficult to remove, along with the various risk factors linked to these complications, can help providers improve their counseling and take appropriate precautions with IUD insertion to better avoid them, as well as manage them when they inevitably occur.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ANTEBY E, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P112
[2]   Effects of Age, Parity, and Device Type on Complications and Discontinuation of Intrauterine Devices [J].
Aoun, Joelle ;
Dines, Virginia A. ;
Stovall, Dale W. ;
Mete, Mihriye ;
Nelson, Casey B. ;
Gomez-Lobo, Veronica .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (03) :585-592
[3]   Association of the Timing of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion and Breastfeeding With Risks of Intrauterine Device Expulsion [J].
Armstrong, Mary Anne ;
Raine-Bennett, Tina ;
Reed, Susan D. ;
Gatz, Jennifer ;
Getahun, Darios ;
Schoendorf, Juliane ;
Postlethwaite, Debbie ;
Fassett, Michael J. ;
Peipert, Jeffrey F. ;
Saltus, Catherine W. ;
Merchant, Maqdooda ;
Alabaster, Amy ;
Zhou, Xiaolei ;
Ichikawa, Laura ;
Shi, Jiaxiao M. ;
Chiu, Vicki Y. ;
Xie, Fagen ;
Hunter, Shannon ;
Wang, Jinyi ;
Ritchey, Mary E. ;
Chillemi, Giulia ;
Im, Theresa M. ;
Takhar, Harpreet S. ;
Pisa, Federica ;
Asiimwe, Alex ;
Anthony, Mary S. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (02)
[4]   Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Averbach, Sarah H. ;
Ermias, Yokabed ;
Jeng, Gary ;
Curtis, Kathryn M. ;
Whiteman, Maura K. ;
Berry-Bibee, Erin ;
Jamieson, Denise J. ;
Marchbanks, Polly A. ;
Tepper, Naomi K. ;
Jatlaoui, Tara C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (02) :177-188
[5]   Performance of copper intrauterine devices when inserted after an expulsion [J].
Bahamondes, L ;
Diaz, J ;
Marchi, NM ;
Petta, CA ;
Cristofoletti, MD ;
Gomez, G .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (11) :2917-2918
[6]   Effect of vaginal administration of misoprostol before intrauterine contraceptive insertion following previous insertion failure: a double blind RCT [J].
Bahamondes, M. Valeria ;
Espejo-Arce, Ximena ;
Bahamondes, Luis .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 (08) :1861-1866
[7]  
Bahamondes M Valeria, 2011, Contraception, V84, pe11, DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.05.012
[8]   Perforation risk and intra-uterine devices: results of the EURAS-IUD 5-year extension study [J].
Barnett, Clare ;
Moehner, Sabine ;
Thai Do Minh ;
Heinemann, Klaas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2017, 22 (06) :424-428
[9]  
Bayard KE, 2022, CONTRACEPTION
[10]   Complications and Continuation of Intrauterine Device Use Among Commercially Insured Teenagers [J].
Berenson, Abbey B. ;
Tan, Alai ;
Hirth, Jacqueline M. ;
Wilkinson, Gregg S. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (05) :951-958