Benefit-cost ratios of carbon dioxide removal strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Cael, B. B. [1 ]
Goodwin, P. [2 ]
Pearce, C. R. [1 ]
Stainforth, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Oceanog Ctr, Southampton, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Southampton, England
[3] London Sch Econ, London, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
climate change; carbon dioxide removal; net zero; cost-benefit analysis;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/acffdc
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
All pathways to achieving the Paris Agreement target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees C or 2 degrees C require the large-scale removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. Many CO2 removal (CDR) strategies have been proposed, which vary widely in both price per ton of CO2 removed and storage timescale of this removed CO2, as well as mechanism, maturity, scalability, and other factors. However, it has not yet been thoroughly assessed whether the benefits, in terms of climate change-related damages avoided, of CDR deployment exceeds their cost at current reported prices and storage timescales, or what cost is required for CDR strategies with a given storage timescale to provide net benefits and how these depend on socioeconomic assumptions. For CDR strategies that have long storage ( > 500 year) timescales, these questions reduce to whether its price is lower than the social cost of carbon, but here we show for CDR strategies that operate over shorter timescales they also depend on the duration of storage. We demonstrate that for CDR strategies with reported storage timescales of decades to centuries, the benefits of their deployment outweigh their reported costs under middle-of-the-road socioeconomic assumptions, and in some cases their benefits still outweigh their costs under optimistic socioeconomic assumptions. Overall, the benefit-cost ratios of the evaluated CDR strategies vary by more than an order of magnitude, and are strongly influenced by both price and storage timescale. Our results provide a framework that can be used to assess and compare different CDR strategies quantitatively to help guide future research, development, and policy efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefit-cost analysis in public health
    Lave, LB
    Joshi, SV
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 17 : 203 - 219
  • [2] Water quality indices and benefit-cost analysis
    Walsh, Patrick J.
    Wheeler, William J.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2013, 4 (01): : 81 - 105
  • [3] Benefit-cost analysis of forest carbon for landowners: An illustration based on a southern pine plantation
    Mei, Bin
    Clutter, Michael L.
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [4] Monetizing Animal Welfare Impacts for Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Budolfson, Mark
    Espinosa, Romain
    Fischer, Bob
    Treich, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2024,
  • [5] Benefit-Cost Analysis in the States: Status, Impact, and Challenges
    White, Darcy
    VanLandingham, Gary
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2015, 6 (02) : 369 - 399
  • [6] Benefit-Cost Analysis, Policy Impacts, and Congressional Hearings
    Carlson, Deven
    Ripberger, Joseph
    Wehde, Wesley
    Jenkins-Smith, Hank
    Silva, Carol
    Gupta, Kuhika
    Jones, Benjamin
    Berrens, Robert
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2019, 10 (01) : 65 - 94
  • [7] Mapping public appraisals of carbon dioxide removal
    Bellamy, Rob
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2022, 76
  • [8] The triumph of regulatory politics: Benefit-cost analysis and political salience
    Shapiro, Stuart
    Morrall, John F., III
    REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2012, 6 (02) : 189 - 206
  • [9] The Benefit-Cost Ratio as a Decision Criteria When Managing Catastrophes
    Aurland-Bredesen, Kine Josefine
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 77 (02): : 345 - 363
  • [10] The Benefit-Cost Ratio as a Decision Criteria When Managing Catastrophes
    Kine Josefine Aurland-Bredesen
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020, 77 : 345 - 363