Analysis on Trade Competition and Complementarity of High-Quality Agricultural Products in Countries along the Belt and Road Initiative

被引:4
作者
Wang, Xiao [1 ]
Shi, Jinming [2 ]
Li, Jia [2 ]
Chen, Yu [1 ]
Liu, Jianxu [1 ]
Sriboonchitta, Songsak [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Econ, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative; export competitiveness of agricultural products; trade complementarity of agricultural products; CHINA BELT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/su15086671
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road Initiative was proposed by China in 2013 as a response to sluggish global economic growth. With most countries along the Belt and Road being developing countries, it is crucial to strengthen trade cooperation in agricultural products. However, the current literature lacks an analysis of the competitiveness and complementarity of agricultural products in these countries. This study aims to fill this gap by showing that the Belt and Road Initiative has reduced agricultural export competitiveness and increased agricultural trade complementarity. Several factors influence the similarity and complementarity of agricultural exports in participating countries along the Belt and Road, including geographical distance, level of economic development, free trade agreements, degree of country openness, exchange rates, cultural differences, share of agricultural value added, and level of infrastructure. The detailed analysis shows that the Belt and Road Initiative has significantly improved the quality of the agricultural exports of participating countries. The results of this paper provide a theoretical basis for the high-quality development of agricultural products in participating countries along the Belt and Road.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Agricultural legacy and individualistic culture
    Ang, James B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2019, 24 (04) : 397 - 425
  • [2] Arrfat Y, 2020, PALGR MAC ASIAN BUS, P203, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-18959-4_9
  • [3] TRADE LIBERALISATION AND REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
    BALASSA, B
    [J]. MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1965, 33 (02): : 99 - 123
  • [4] Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States
    Beck, Thorsten
    Levine, Ross
    Levkov, Alexey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) : 1637 - 1667
  • [5] Blazquez-Lido J., 2008, SOC SCI RES NETW, V11, P15
  • [6] Bouët A, 2017, J ECON INTEGR, V32, P937, DOI 10.11130/jei.2017.32.4.937
  • [7] Globalization and the gains from variety
    Broda, Christian
    Weinstein, David E.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 121 (02) : 541 - 585
  • [8] The need for international policy coordination: what's old, what's new, what's yet to come?
    Canzoneri, MB
    Cumby, RE
    Diba, BT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 66 (02) : 363 - 384
  • [9] Clough S.B., 1949, APPL EC ASPECTS WORL, VVolume 9, P112
  • [10] The Eurasian Economic Union as an Element of the Belt and Road Initiative
    Czerewacz-Filipowicz, Katarzyna
    [J]. COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC RESEARCH-CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, 2019, 22 (02): : 23 - 37