Penile-Sparing Surgery for Tumour Recurrence after Previous Glansectomy/Partial Penectomy: Treatment Feasibility and Oncological Outcomes

被引:2
作者
Musi, Gennaro [1 ,2 ]
Molinari, Filippo [1 ]
Mistretta, Francesco A. [1 ,2 ]
Piccinelli, Mattia Luca [1 ]
Guzzo, Sonia [1 ]
Tozzi, Marco [1 ]
Lievore, Elena [1 ]
Blezien, Oskar [1 ]
Fontana, Matteo [1 ]
Cioffi, Antonio [1 ]
Cullura, Daniela [3 ]
Verri, Elena [3 ]
Cossu Rocca, Maria [3 ]
Nole, Franco [3 ]
Ferro, Matteo [1 ]
de Cobelli, Ottavio [1 ,2 ]
Luzzago, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, IEO European Inst Oncol, Dept Urol, Via Ripamonti 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematol Oncol, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[3] IRCCS, IEO European Inst Oncol, Dept Med Oncol, Div Urogenital & Head & Neck Tumours, Via Ripamonti 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
glansectomy; partial penectomy; laser ablation; excision; penile cancer; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT; CANCER; MARGINS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15194807
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary To date, no specific analyses focusing on penile-sparing surgery for local tumour recurrence after previous glansectomy or partial penectomy have been reported. We addressed this void and we considered a retrospective series of consecutive patients treated at a single institution. We focused on: (1) treatment feasibility, (2) complications, and (3) oncological outcomes.Abstract We tested the feasibility and oncological outcomes after penile-sparing surgery (PSS) for local recurrent penile cancer after a previous glansectomy/partial penectomy. We retrospectively analysed 13 patients (1997-2022) with local recurrence of penile cancer after a previous glansectomy or partial penectomy. All patients underwent PSS: circumcision, excision, or laser ablation. First, technical feasibility, treatment setting, and complications (Clavien-Dindo) were recorded. Second, Kaplan-Meier plots depicted overall and local recurrences over time. Overall, 11 (84.5%) vs. 2 (15.5%) patients were previously treated with glansectomy vs. partial penectomy. The median (IQR) time to disease recurrence was 56 (13-88) months. Six (46%) vs. two (15.5%) vs. five (38.5%) patients were treated with, respectively, local excision vs. local excision + circumcision vs. laser ablation. All procedures, except one, were performed in an outpatient setting. Only one Clavien-Dindo 2 complication was recorded. The median follow-up time was 41 months. Overall, three (23%) vs. four (30.5%) patients experienced local vs. overall recurrence, respectively. All local recurrences were safely treated with salvage surgery. In conclusion, we reported the results of a preliminary analysis testing safety, feasibility, and early oncological outcomes of PSS procedures for patients with local recurrence after previous glansectomy or partial penectomy. Stronger oncological outcomes should be tested in other series to optimise patient selection.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Predictive factors for local recurrence after glansectomy and neoglans reconstruction for penile squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Albersen, Maarten ;
Parnham, Arie ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Sahdev, Varun ;
Christodoulidou, Michelle ;
Castiglione, Fabio ;
Nigam, Raj ;
Malone, Peter ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Jameson, Charles ;
Minhas, Suks ;
Ralph, David J. ;
Muneer, Asif .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (04) :141-146
[2]  
Anastasiadis E., 2021, CURR OPIN UROL, V32, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000939, 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000939]
[3]   Peniscopically Controlled CO2 Laser Excision for Conservative Treatment of In Situ and T1 Penile Carcinoma: Report on 224 Patients [J].
Bandieramonte, Gaetano ;
Colecchia, Maurizio ;
Mariani, Luigi ;
Lo Vullo, Salvatore ;
Pizzocaro, Giorgio ;
Piva, Luigi ;
Nicolai, Nicola ;
Salvioni, Roberto ;
Lezzi, Valentina ;
Stefanon, Bernardina ;
De Palo, Giuseppe .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (04) :875-884
[4]   Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: A Multicenter International Retrospective Cohort [J].
Baumgarten, Adam ;
Chipollini, Juan ;
Yan, Sylvia ;
Ottenhof, Sarah R. ;
Tang, Dominic H. ;
Draeger, Desiree ;
Protzel, Chris ;
Zhu, Yao ;
Ye, Ding-wei ;
Hakenberg, Oliver W. ;
Horenblas, Simon ;
Watkin, Nicholas A. ;
Spiess, Philippe E. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (05) :1233-1237
[5]   Multi-institutional long-term experience with conservative surgery for invasive penile carcinoma [J].
Bissada, NK ;
Yakout, HH ;
Fahmy, WE ;
Gayed, MST ;
Touijer, AK ;
Greene, GF ;
Hanash, KA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (02) :500-502
[6]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[7]   Phallus Preservation in Penile Cancer Surgery: Patient-reported Aesthetic & Functional Outcomes [J].
Croghan, Stefanie M. ;
Compton, Niall ;
Daniels, Anne E. ;
Fitzgibbon, Linda ;
Daly, Padraig J. ;
Cullen, Ivor M. .
UROLOGY, 2021, 152 :60-66
[8]   Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer-Does it Affect Survival? [J].
Djajadiningrat, Rosa S. ;
van Werkhoven, Erik ;
Meinhardt, Wim ;
van Rhijn, Bas W. G. ;
Bex, Axel ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
Horenblas, Simon .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) :120-125
[9]   Long-Term Outcome of Excisional Organ Sparing Surgery for Carcinoma of the Penis [J].
Feldman, Adam S. ;
McDougal, W. Scott .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) :1303-1307
[10]   Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis - Gruppo Uro-Oncologrico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer Data Base Data [J].
Ficarra, V ;
Zattoni, F ;
Cunico, SC ;
Galetti, TP ;
Luciani, L ;
Fandella, A ;
Guazzieri, S ;
Maruzzi, D ;
Sava, T ;
Siracusano, S ;
Pilloni, S ;
Tasca, A ;
Martignoni, G ;
Gardiman, M ;
Tardanico, R ;
Zambolin, T ;
Cisternino, A ;
Artibani, W .
CANCER, 2005, 103 (12) :2507-2516