Telagogy: New theorisations about learning and teaching in higher education post-Covid-19 pandemic

被引:3
作者
Pitso, Teboho [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vaal Univ Technol, Ctr Innovat & Entrepreneurship, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
[2] Vaal Univ Technol, Ctr Innovat & Entrepreneurship, 37 Diana Ave, ZA-1939 Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
关键词
learning; non-affirmative theory of education; remote learning; technology; curriculum;
D O I
10.1080/2331186X.2023.2258278
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teaching history invokes the motif of ancient feud with dispute focused on meanings of learning. Learning meanings deriving from traditional theories such as behaviourism need abandoning post-pandemic. Emerging theories, including Non-Affirmative Theory of Education (NATE) with a strong social justice motif, ought to undergird new learning. This would provide opportunities for remote learning to develop into a socially-just empowering learning experience that derives from rooted cosmopolitanism and AI systems (telagogy). Telagogy would assume an asynchronous and technology-as-essence framework in lieu of the COVID-19 remote learning synchronous and technology-as-utility framework that mimicked in-person contact sessions. In the latter framework, learning comes under students' control who can access it anywhere and anytime plus students can curate their own personal curriculum. A qualitative Empowerment Evaluation method, with 15 advanced, multi-disciplinary undergraduates (N = 15) was used to investigate effects of one of the AI systems, chat-Generative Pre-Training Transformer (chat-GPT) on students' learning. A Team Formation Process developed by Pitso (2020) was used to analyse data. Findings show that chat-GPT lessen the time of doing an assignment and help students to be creative suggesting that undergraduate studies ought to shift to productive thinking.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]  
Degushi A., 2020, What is Society 5.0?
[12]  
Eyring H., 2011, The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out
[13]   The Savage Origins of Child-Centered Pedagogy, 1871-1913 [J].
Fallace, Thomas .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (01) :73-103
[14]  
Freire P., 2000, Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniv)
[15]  
Frempong G., 2022, Educational Paradigm with Ubuntu Mindset: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals in Education
[16]  
Fukuyama M., 2018, Japan Spotlight, P47
[17]   What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences [J].
Gerring, J .
POLITY, 1999, 31 (03) :357-393
[18]   E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students' Preferences and Behaviors [J].
Gherhes, Vasile ;
Stoian, Claudia E. ;
Farcasiu, Marcela Alina ;
Stanici, Miroslav .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
[19]  
Guise C., 1914, The Theory of recapitulation in child development
[20]  
Haldane J., 2022, Journal of Education, V10, P1