Comparison of Ropivacaine Plus Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine Plus Magnesium Sulfate Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries

被引:2
作者
Kumar, Manoj [1 ]
Singh, Rakesh Bahadur [1 ]
Vikal, Jai Prakash [1 ]
Yadav, Jay Brijesh Singh [1 ]
Singh, Dheer [1 ]
机构
[1] Uttar Pradesh Univ Med Sci, Anesthesiol, Etawah, India
关键词
spine surgeries; postoperative pain; infiltration; magnesium sulphate; dexmedetomidine; ropivacaine; DOUBLE-BLIND; WOUND INFILTRATION; PAIN;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.36295
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acute pain after lumbar spine surgery is due to soft tissue and muscle separation at the operation site. Local anesthetic wound infiltration is a safe and effective method for postoperative analgesia following lumbar spine surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy of ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgeries.Materials and method: This prospective randomized study was conducted on 60 patients, aged between 18 and 65 years, either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I and II patients scheduled for single-level lumbar laminectomy. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups 30 patients each. Twenty to 30 minutes before skin closure and after hemostasis was achieved, the surgeon infiltrated 10 mL of study drugs into paravertebral muscles on each side. Group A received 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine and group B received 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate. Postoperative pain was assessed by the visual analog scale at 0 minute (immediately after extubation), 30 minutes, 1st hour, 2nd hour, and thereafter at 4th hour, 6th hour, 12th hour, and 24th hour. Time to rescue analgesia, total analgesic consumption, hemodynamic variables, and complications if any were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).Results: The time to first requirement of analgesia in postoperative period was significantly longer in group A (10.05 +/- 1.62 hours) than in group B (8.07 +/- 1.83 hours) (p < 0.001). Total analgesic consumption was significantly higher in group B (197.50 +/- 36.76 mL) compared to group A (142.50 +/- 22.88 mL) (p < 0.001). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in group A compared to group B (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Local infiltration of surgical site with ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine provided better pain control than ropivacaine plus magnesium sulphate infiltration and is safe and effective analgesia for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries in postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for wound infiltration in patients undergoing open gastrectomy A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Luan, Hengfei
    Zhu, Pin
    Zhang, Xiaobao
    Tian, Liang
    Feng, Jiying
    Wu, Yong
    Yan, Yongxin
    Zhao, Zhibin
    Gu, Xiaoping
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (38)
  • [22] Ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine in serratus anterior plane block patients undergoing post-thoracotomy surgery: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
    Rashidi, Mahbobeh
    Mahmoodi, Kamran
    Baghbanian, Reza
    Mohtadi, Ahmadreza
    Selahi, Mahdi
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [23] Comparison of intraperitoneal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy
    Lambertini, Carlotta
    Kluge, Katharina
    Lanza-Perea, Marta
    Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo
    Guerrero, Karin S. Kalchofner
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 45 (06) : 865 - 870
  • [24] Postoperative Analgesia After Wound Infiltration With Tramadol and Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lumbar Discectomies: A Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial
    Mitra, Saikat
    Purohit, Shobha
    Sharma, Mamta
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 29 (04) : 433 - 438
  • [25] Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Postoperative Epidural Analgesia in Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery
    Park, Sang Jun
    Shin, Seokyung
    Kim, Shin Hyung
    Kim, Hyun Woo
    Kim, Seung Hyun
    Do, Hae Yoon
    Choi, Yong Seon
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (03) : 650 - 657
  • [26] Comparative Study of Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine With Dexmedetomidine in Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Sections
    Nag, Deb Sanjay
    Gehlot, Priti
    Sharma, Prashant
    Kumar, Himanshu
    Singh, Umesh Kumar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [27] Dexmedetomidine versus Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Infraumbilical Surgeries for Postoperative Analgesia: A Randomised Clinical Study
    Kumari, Anupama
    Patel, Aarjvi
    Berawala, Payal
    Thomas, Sara mary
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2025, 19 (01) : UC39 - UC44
  • [28] Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Ropivacaine Plus Diprospan for Preemptive Scalp Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Han, Xueye
    Ren, Tong
    Wang, Yang
    Ji, Nan
    Luo, Fang
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 135 (06) : 1253 - 1261
  • [29] Effect of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
    Hao, Conghui
    Qian, Haitao
    Li, Han
    Zhu, Pin
    Zhang, Xiaobao
    Zhao, Zhibin
    Luan, Hengfei
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 85 (12): : 5977 - 5982
  • [30] Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl and ropivacaine plus fentanyl for labor analgesia
    Bolukbasi, D
    Sener, EB
    Sarihasan, B
    Kocamanoglu, S
    Tur, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2005, 14 (04) : 288 - 293