Comparison of Ropivacaine Plus Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine Plus Magnesium Sulfate Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries

被引:2
作者
Kumar, Manoj [1 ]
Singh, Rakesh Bahadur [1 ]
Vikal, Jai Prakash [1 ]
Yadav, Jay Brijesh Singh [1 ]
Singh, Dheer [1 ]
机构
[1] Uttar Pradesh Univ Med Sci, Anesthesiol, Etawah, India
关键词
spine surgeries; postoperative pain; infiltration; magnesium sulphate; dexmedetomidine; ropivacaine; DOUBLE-BLIND; WOUND INFILTRATION; PAIN;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.36295
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acute pain after lumbar spine surgery is due to soft tissue and muscle separation at the operation site. Local anesthetic wound infiltration is a safe and effective method for postoperative analgesia following lumbar spine surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy of ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgeries.Materials and method: This prospective randomized study was conducted on 60 patients, aged between 18 and 65 years, either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I and II patients scheduled for single-level lumbar laminectomy. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups 30 patients each. Twenty to 30 minutes before skin closure and after hemostasis was achieved, the surgeon infiltrated 10 mL of study drugs into paravertebral muscles on each side. Group A received 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine and group B received 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate. Postoperative pain was assessed by the visual analog scale at 0 minute (immediately after extubation), 30 minutes, 1st hour, 2nd hour, and thereafter at 4th hour, 6th hour, 12th hour, and 24th hour. Time to rescue analgesia, total analgesic consumption, hemodynamic variables, and complications if any were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).Results: The time to first requirement of analgesia in postoperative period was significantly longer in group A (10.05 +/- 1.62 hours) than in group B (8.07 +/- 1.83 hours) (p < 0.001). Total analgesic consumption was significantly higher in group B (197.50 +/- 36.76 mL) compared to group A (142.50 +/- 22.88 mL) (p < 0.001). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in group A compared to group B (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Local infiltration of surgical site with ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine provided better pain control than ropivacaine plus magnesium sulphate infiltration and is safe and effective analgesia for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries in postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison the effect of bupivacaine plus magnesium sulfate with ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate infiltration on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy with general anesthesia
    Sane, Shahryar
    Mahdkhah, Ata
    Golabi, Parang
    Hesami, Seyyed Adnan
    Haki, Behzad Kazemi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 38 (02) : 256 - 259
  • [2] Comparison of caudal ropivacaine, ropivacaine plus ketamine and ropivacaine plus tramadol administration for postoperative analgesia in children
    Günes, Y
    Seçen, M
    Özcengiz, D
    Gündüz, M
    Balcioglu, O
    Isik, G
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2004, 14 (07) : 557 - 563
  • [3] Comparison of ropivacaine plus sufentanil and ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine for labor epidural analgesia A randomized controlled trial protocol
    Chen, Gang
    Gong, Maowei
    Liu, Yi
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (36) : E22113
  • [4] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POST-OPERATIVE CONTINUOUS WOUND INFILTRATION WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE - ROPIVACAINE MIXTURE AND PLAIN ROPIVACAINE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LUMBAR SPINE SURGERIES
    Bommalingappa, Basavaraj
    Channabasappa, Shivakumar M.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (92): : 6820 - 6823
  • [5] Epidural Ropivacaine and Dexmedetomidine with that of Epidural Ropivacaine and Fentanyl for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgeries- A Randomised Double-Blinded Study
    Prashanth, G.
    Dash, Sulochana
    Mohapatra, Sudeep
    Moda, Nupur
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (08)
  • [6] Comparison of ropivacaine, ropivacaine plus tramadol and ropivacaine plus morphine in patients undergoing minor hand surgery
    Sakirgil, Enis
    Gunes, Yasemin
    Ozbek, Hayri
    Ozcengiz, Dilek
    Balcioglu, Okan
    Isik, Geylan
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2005, 17 (02): : 52 - 58
  • [7] Wound Infiltration and Instillation Technique for Postoperative Analgesia Using Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries
    Kumar, Manoj
    Srivastava, Saumya
    Singh, Dheer
    Yadav, Jay Brijesh Singh
    Kumar, Vimal
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [8] Epidural ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus tramadol in postoperative analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal surgery: a comparison
    Inanoglu, Kerem
    Ozcengiz, Dilek
    Gunes, Yasemin
    Unlugenc, Hakki
    Isik, Geylan
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2010, 24 (05) : 700 - 704
  • [9] Epidural ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus tramadol in postoperative analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal surgery: a comparison
    Kerem Inanoglu
    Dilek Ozcengiz
    Yasemin Gunes
    Hakki Unlugenc
    Geylan Isik
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2010, 24 : 700 - 704
  • [10] Intraperitoneal Instillation of Levobupivacaine Plus Dexmedetomidine Versus Ropivacaine Plus Dexmedetomidine for Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Roat, Rekha
    Jingar, Hemant
    Verma, Rajendra
    Damor, Mamta
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2023, 13 (02) : 177 - 180