Outcome assessment in complex therapeutic-rehabilitative treatments for personality disorders: a systematic review

被引:0
作者
Maggioni, Anna [1 ]
Risso, Paola [1 ]
Caslini, Manuela [1 ]
Bailo, Luca [1 ]
Pellegrini, Elisabetta [1 ]
Rezzonico, Giorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] II Volo Soc Cooperat ETS, Monticello Brianza, LC, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY | 2023年 / 29卷 / 3-4期
关键词
personality disorders; multimodal treatments; psychosocial interventions; layered care; outcomes; DIALECTICAL-BEHAVIORAL-THERAPY; COMMUNITY TREATMENT; PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT; 10-YEAR COURSE; BORDERLINE; SEVERITY; PROGRAMS; TRAITS; ADULTS; COST;
D O I
10.36148/2284-0249-N186
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Personality disorders (PD) have a large social impact on the general population. Currently, the literature offers evidence of therapeutic outcomes pursued in the outpatient setting and focused mainly on psychotherapy. To date, a limited number of studies seem to have focused on the effects of residential multimodal treatments specifically based on several psychosocial interventions. Commensurate with this statement, a review has been conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The objective was to map the literature with the purpose of identifying which methods and tools were used to assess therapeutic intervention outcomes in multimodal contexts. Among the 718 studies published between 2000 and 2022, 23 of them met the criteria to be included in the present review. Despite the many limitations, it is possible to state which are the most relevant characteristics considered in these previous studies: (a) the areas evaluated at the end of complex treatments are clinical, psychosocial functioning and use of services; (b) the overall therapeutic outcome was assessed through the use of many measuring instruments; and (c) evaluation of integrated therapeutic processes that lead to an improvement in the clinical picture of patients seems to be the most complex aspect to deal with. In conclusion, to fully understand which are the most relevant areas that contribute to the evaluation of therapeutic outcome in residential multimodal treatments, specifically based on several psychosocial interventions, more studies (hopefully also innovative) are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 99
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, Borderline personality disorder: Treatment and management
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, La ricerca in psicoterapia. Modelli e strumenti
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Personality disorders: borderline and antisocial
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, Accordo della Conferenza Unificata 137/2014 (137/CU/2014)
  • [6] Is reflective functioning associated with clinical symptoms and long-term course in patients with personality disorders?
    Antonsen, Bjornar T.
    Johansen, Merete S.
    Ro, Frida G.
    Kvarstein, Elfrida H.
    Wilberg, Theresa
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 64 : 46 - 58
  • [7] Step-down versus outpatient psychotherapeutic treatment for personality disorders: 6-year follow-up of the Ulleval personality project
    Antonsen, Bjornar T.
    Klungsoyr, Ole
    Kamps, Anne
    Hummelen, Benjamin
    Johansen, Merete S.
    Pedersen, Geir
    Urnes, Oyvind
    Kvarstein, Elfrida H.
    Karterud, Sigmund
    Wilberg, Theresa
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 14
  • [8] APA, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, VVolume 21, P591, DOI [10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104, DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199975839.013.104]
  • [9] Banerjee P., 2009, Journal of Continuing Professional Development, V15, P389, DOI DOI 10.1192/APT.BP.107.005389
  • [10] Treatment of personality disorder
    Bateman, Anthony W.
    Gunderson, John
    Mulder, Roger
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 385 (9969) : 735 - 743