Life cycle assessment of green-grey coastal flood protection infrastructure: a case study from New Orleans

被引:2
作者
Hasan, Rahaf [1 ]
McPhillips, Lauren [2 ,3 ]
Warn, Gordon [2 ]
Bilec, Melissa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Mascaro Ctr Sustainable Innovat, Swanson Sch Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, University Pk, PA USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, University Pk, PA USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY | 2024年 / 4卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
life cycle assessment; coastal flood management; flood damage; grey infrastructure; nature-based solutions; levee; constructed oyster reef; HURRICANE KATRINA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RISK; DAMAGE; RESILIENCE; SYSTEM; LCA; COMMUNITIES; ADAPTATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1088/2634-4505/ad3578
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study compared the life cycle environmental impacts of three coastal flood management strategies: grey infrastructure (levee), green-grey infrastructure (levee and oyster reef), and a do-nothing scenario, considering the flood damage of a single flooding event in the absence of protection infrastructure. A case study was adopted from a New Orleans, Louisiana residential area to facilitate the comparison. Hazus software, design guidelines, reports, existing projects, and literature were utilized as foreground data for modelling materials. A process-based life cycle assessment was used to assess environmental impacts. The life cycle environmental impacts included global warming, ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, smog formation, resource depletion, ecotoxicity, and various human health effects. The ecoinvent database was used for the selected life cycle unit processes. The mean results show green-grey infrastructure as the most promising strategy across most impact categories, reducing 47% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the do-nothing strategy. Compared to grey infrastructure, green-grey infrastructure mitigates 13%-15% of the environmental impacts while providing equivalent flood protection. A flooding event with a 100-year recurrence interval in the study area is estimated at 34 million kg of CO2 equivalent per kilometre of shoreline, while grey and green-grey infrastructure mitigating such flooding is estimated to be 21 and 18 million kg, respectively. This study reinforced that coastal flooding environmental impacts are primarily caused by rebuilding damaged houses, especially concrete and structural timber replacement, accounting for 90% of GHG emissions, with only 10% associated with flood debris waste treatment. The asphalt cover of the levee was identified as the primary contributor to environmental impacts in grey infrastructure, accounting for over 75% of GHG emissions during construction. We found that there is an important interplay between grey and green infrastructure and optimizing their designs can offer solutions to sustainable coastal flood protection.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] A Review of Cost Estimates for Flood Adaptation
    Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
    [J]. WATER, 2018, 10 (11)
  • [2] Multi-criteria Approach for Selection of Green and Grey Infrastructure to Reduce Flood Risk and Increase CO-benefits
    Alves, Alida
    Gersonius, Berry
    Sanchez, Arlex
    Vojinovic, Zoran
    Kapelan, Zoran
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (07) : 2505 - 2522
  • [3] Amir Hamzah Sharaai Amir Hamzah Sharaai, 2010, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, V4, P4313
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, The International Levee Handbook
  • [5] Baggett LP., 2014, Oyster habitat restoration monitoring and assessment handbook
  • [6] The Value of Wetlands in Protecting Southeast Louisiana from Hurricane Storm Surges
    Barbier, Edward B.
    Georgiou, Ioannis Y.
    Enchelmeyer, Brian
    Reed, Denise J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [7] Bare J.C., 2002, J IND ECOL, V6, P49, DOI [10.1162/108819802766269539, DOI 10.1162/108819802766269539]
  • [8] Environmental Impact Bonds: a common framework and looking ahead
    Brand, M. W.
    Seipp, K. Quesnel
    Saksa, P.
    Ulibarri, N.
    Bomblies, A.
    Mandle, L.
    Allaire, M.
    Wing, O.
    Tobin-de la Puente, J.
    Parker, E. A.
    Nay, J.
    Sanders, B. F.
    Rosowsky, D.
    Lee, J.
    Johnson, K.
    Gudino-Elizondo, N.
    Ajami, N.
    Wobbrock, N.
    Adriaens, P.
    Grant, S. B.
    Wright, S.
    Gartner, T.
    Knight, Z.
    Gibbons, J. P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 1 (02):
  • [9] Brinkhoff T., 2023, CITY POPULATION
  • [10] Hotspots analysis and critical interpretation of food life cycle assessment studies for selecting eco-innovation options and for policy support
    Castellani, Valentina
    Sala, Serenella
    Benini, Lorenzo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 556 - 568