E-DSGE model with endogenous capital utilization rate

被引:5
作者
Chan, Ying Tung [1 ]
Punzi, Maria Teresa [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Bay Area Int Business Sch, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[2] Singapore Management Univ, Singapore Green Finance Ctr Sim Kee Boon Inst Fina, Singapore, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
E-DSGE model; Environmental policy; Capital utilization rate; Energy price; Welfare analysis; INVESTMENT; ENERGY; INNOVATION; FUTURE; SHOCKS; MARKET; TAX; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137640
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental policy research has increased due to stricter policies aligned with climate goals. However, to achieve the goal of net-zero emissions, the adoption of even stronger policies and increased carbon taxes is necessary, with transition risk becoming a major concern for companies. Even though governments worldwide have been employing a range of methods such as carbon tax, cap-and-trade, and intensity targets to mitigate the impact of climate change, a pivotal debate around determining the optimal policy that reduces emissions without harming the economy continues. Our paper delves into the environmental policy assessment emphasizing the role of endogenous capital utilization rates, which have hitherto been largely disregarded in literature. We study how endogenous capital utilization rate affects the transmission mechanism of economic shocks and the optimal environmental policy choice. To evaluate the quantitative impact of the transmission mechanism, we introduce distinct features to the environmental-dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (E-DSGE) model, including endogenous capital utilization, time-varying depreciation of capital, and environment quality shocks. We find that the complementarity between energy and capital leads to an amplification effect of the conventional transmission mechanism. Our model with these ingredients ranks any carbon tax below 25% as the best policy in terms of welfare improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   A Real Options Analysis of the Effects of Oil Price Uncertainty and Carbon Taxes on the Optimal Timing of Oil Field Decommissioning [J].
Abdul-Salam, Yakubu .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (06) :25-46
[2]   Natural resources and environmental quality: Exploring the regional variations among Chinese provinces with a novel approach [J].
Ahmad, Fayyaz ;
Draz, Muhammad Umar ;
Chandio, Abbas Ali ;
Ahmad, Munir ;
Su, Lijuan ;
Shahzad, Farrukh ;
Jia, Mingqi .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 77
[3]  
Albrizio S., 2014, Empirical evidence on the effects of environmental policy stringency on productivity growth
[4]  
Angelopoulos K., 2010, What is the best environmental policy? Taxes, permits and rules under economic and environmental uncertainty
[5]   First-and second-best allocations under economic and environmental uncertainty [J].
Angelopoulos, Konstantinos ;
Economides, George ;
Philippopoulos, Apostolis .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2013, 20 (03) :360-380
[6]   GHG Emissions Control and Monetary Policy [J].
Annicchiarico, Barbara ;
Di Dio, Fabio .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2017, 67 (04) :823-851
[7]   Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model [J].
Annicchiarico, Barbara ;
Di Dio, Fabio .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 69 :1-21
[8]   Fluctuations in Uncertainty [J].
Bloom, Nicholas .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 28 (02) :153-175
[9]  
Bongers A., 2020, ENERGY RES LETT, V1, DOI [10.46557/001c.13186, DOI 10.46557/001C.13186]
[10]   Labor Supply in the Past, Present, and Future: A Balanced-Growth Perspective [J].
Boppart, Timo ;
Krusell, Per .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (01) :118-157