Robot-Assisted Heller Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Ataya, Karim [1 ]
Bsat, Ayman [2 ]
Aljaafreh, Almoutuz [3 ]
Bourji, Hussein [4 ]
Ayoubi, Amir Rabih Al [5 ]
Hassan, Najwa [6 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Inst Minimally Invas Surg, London, England
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Gen Surg, Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Kings Coll Hosp London, Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, London, England
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Gen Surg, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Lebanese Univ, Fac Med Sci, Gen Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[6] Beirut Arab Univ, Dept Surg, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
esophageal myotomy; general and laparoscopic surgery; robotic-assisted surgery; achalasia cardia; heller myotomy; ESOPHAGEAL ACHALASIA; SURGERY; FUNDOPLICATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.48495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Robot-assisted Heller myotomy (RAHM) is an increasingly popular alternative to the traditional laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) in the surgical management of achalasia, with similar outcomes and potentially lower complication rates. We aimed to systematically review the literature by comparing the technical success, outcomes, and complications of RAHM and LHM.We searched PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register for articles published between 2001 and 2023. Data on technical success, clinical outcomes, length of hospital stay, esophageal perforation rate, and overall mortality were extracted.A total of 11 articles were included in the study, comparing a total of 3,543 RAHM and 15,434 LHM cases. The mean operative time was significantly higher in the RAHM procedure with a total mean difference of 23.95 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 17.09, 30.81; p < 0.00001; I-2 = 99%). However, the RAHM was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay, with a total mean difference of-0.24 (95% Cl =-0.40, -0.08; p < 0.00001; I-2 = 81%). The volume of blood loss was significantly smaller in RAHM with a total mean difference of-61.11 (95% CI =-150.31, 28.09; p < 0.00001; I-2 = 99%). Esophageal mucosal perforation was significantly lower in RAHM with an odds ratio of 0.36 (95% CI = 0.16, 0.82; p = 0.02; I-2 = 22%). Both procedures were associated with similar rates of symptom relief. Although no mortality was recorded in patients who underwent RAHM as opposed to 16 cases in patients who underwent LHM, no statistically significant difference could be reached.Our results demonstrate that while both procedures yield comparable clinical outcomes, RAHM is associated with a lower overall complication rate, particularly a lower rate of esophageal mucosal perforation, shorter hospital stay, and possibly a lower mortality rate. This confirms that RAHM is a viable and justifiable alternative to the conventional LHM in the surgical management of achalasia.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Robotic and per-oral endoscopic myotomy have fewer technical complications compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy
    Ali, Aman B.
    Khan, Najah A.
    Nguyen, Duc T.
    Chihara, Ray
    Chan, Edward Y.
    Graviss, Edward A.
    Dunkin, Brian J.
    Kim, Min P.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (07): : 3191 - 3196
  • [2] Esophageal Achalasia: From Laparoscopic to Robotic Heller Myotomy and Dor Fundoplication
    Arcerito, Massimo
    Jamal, Mazen
    Perez, Martin G.
    Kaur, Harpreet
    Sundahl, Andrew
    Moon, John T.
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2022, 26 (03)
  • [3] How robotic-assisted surgery can decrease the risk of mucosal tear during Heller myotomy procedure?
    Ballouhey Q.
    Dib N.
    Binet A.
    Carcauzon-Couvrat V.
    Clermidi P.
    Longis B.
    Lardy H.
    Languepin J.
    Cros J.
    Fourcade L.
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2017, 11 (2) : 255 - 258
  • [4] CASSELLA RR, 1965, AM J PATHOL, V46, P279
  • [5] Overall Complications Following Robotic Heller Myotomy Are Lower Compared With Laparoscopy
    Chacko, Joel
    Leeds, Steven G.
    Aladegbami, Bola G.
    Ogola, Gerald O.
    Ward, Marc A.
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (03) : 319 - 323
  • [6] Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill
    Chang, L
    Satava, RM
    Pellegrini, CA
    Sinanan, MN
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (11): : 1744 - 1748
  • [7] Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia facilitated by robotic assistance
    Galvani, C.
    Gorodner, M. V.
    Moser, F.
    Baptista, M.
    Donahue, P.
    Horgan, S.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (07): : 1105 - 1112
  • [8] From laparoscopic to robotic-assisted Heller myotomy for achalasia in a single high-volume visceral surgery center: postoperative outcomes and quality of life
    Gass, Jorn-Markus
    Cron, Lucien
    Mongelli, Francesco
    Tartanus, Justyna
    Angehrn, Fiorenzo Valente
    Neuschuetz, Kerstin
    von Fluee, Markus
    Fourie, Lana
    Steinemann, Daniel
    Bolli, Martin
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [9] Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: Multicenter study
    Horgan, S
    Galvani, C
    Gorodner, MT
    Omelanczuck, P
    Elli, F
    Moser, F
    Durand, L
    Caracoche, M
    Nefa, J
    Bustos, S
    Donahue, P
    Ferraina, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (08) : 1020 - 1029
  • [10] Robotic Heller myotomy: A safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices
    Huffmanm, L. C.
    Pandalai, P. K.
    Boulton, B. J.
    James, L.
    Starnes, S. L.
    Reed, M. F.
    Howington, J. A.
    Nussbaum, M. S.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2007, 142 (04) : 613 - 618