Stimulation parameters for motor evoked potentials during intraoperative spinal cord monitoring. A systematic review

被引:5
作者
Dulfer, S. E. [4 ,5 ]
Gadella, M. C.
Sahinovic, M. M. [1 ]
Lange, F. [2 ]
Absalom, A. R. [1 ]
Groen, R. J. M.
Szelenyi, A. [3 ]
Drost, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurosurg, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurol, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Hosp Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munich LMU, Dept Neurosurg, Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurosurg, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Intraoperative neurophysiological; monitoring (IONM); Muscle recorded transcranial electrical; stimulation motor evoked potentials (mTc-MEPs); Direct-waves (D-waves); Stimulation method; Stimulation parameters; Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA); TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; SURGERY; CRITERIA; TRAIN; DEFORMITY; AMPLITUDE; INTERVAL; MUSCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2023.02.170
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to find the optimal stimulation parameters for muscle recorded transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (mTc-MEP) and D-wave monitoring during spinal cord monitoring.Methods: A PRISMA systematic search in Medline and EMBASE and a QUADAS-2 quality evaluation was performed to identify studies that compared stimulation parameters consisting of stimulation location, number of pulses, pulse duration, interstimulus interval, double train (DTS) or recurrent train stimulation (RTS) and intertrain interval (ITI) for performing mTc-MEP and D-wave monitoring. Only studies that used total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) were included. Results: Ten studies that compared stimulation parameters for performing mTc-MEP monitoring (stimu- lation location n=4, number of pulses n=2, pulse duration n=1, interstimulus interval n=4, DTS n=1, RTS n=2, ITI n=2) were included. No studies compared stimulation parameters (stimulation location and pulse duration) for performing D-wave monitoring.Conclusions: Few studies examined the optimal stimulation parameters for monitoring mTc-MEPs and no studies were included for D-wave monitoring. There is a need for prospective research to investigate the optimal stimulation parameters for mTc-MEP with the use of TIVA and D-wave monitoring. Significance: For mTc-MEP monitoring, a table is provided in which the recommended stimulation parameters are stated.(c) 2023 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 80
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Intraoperative direct cortical stimulation motor evoked potentials: Stimulus parameter recommendations based on rheobase and chronaxie [J].
Abalkhail, Tariq M. ;
MacDonald, David B. ;
AlThubaiti, Ibrahim ;
AlOtaibi, Faisal A. ;
Stigsby, Bent ;
Mokeem, Amal A. ;
AlHamoud, Iftetah A. ;
Hassounah, Maher I. ;
Baz, Salah M. ;
AlSemari, Abdulaziz ;
AlDhalaan, Hesham M. ;
Khan, Sameena .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (11) :2300-2308
[2]   Optimal parameters of transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials of the tibialis anterior muscle during pediatric scoliosis surgery [J].
Azabou, E. ;
Manel, V. ;
Andre-Obadia, N. ;
Fischer, C. ;
Mauguiere, F. ;
Peiffer, C. ;
Lofaso, F. ;
Shils, J. L. .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 43 (04) :243-250
[3]   Influence of the Montage of Stimulation Electrodes for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Orthopedic Spine Surgery [J].
Berends, Hanneke I. ;
Journee, Henricus L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 35 (05) :419-425
[4]   Threshold-level multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring [J].
Calancie, B ;
Harris, W ;
Broton, JG ;
Alexeeva, N ;
Green, BA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 88 (03) :457-470
[5]   Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Alarm Criteria for Judging MEP Responses to Transcranial Electric Stimulation: The Threshold-Level Method [J].
Calancie, Blair .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (01) :12-21
[6]  
Deletis V., 2002, Neurophysiology in neurosurgery a modern intraoperative approach, P25
[7]   Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: A review focus on the corticospinal tracts [J].
Deletis, Vedran ;
Sala, Francesco .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (02) :248-264
[8]   The Evidence for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery Does It Make a Difference? [J].
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Brodke, Darrel S. ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Dettori, Joseph R. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) :S37-S46
[9]   Transcranial electrical stimulation: significance of fast versus slow charge delivery for intra-operative monitoring [J].
Hausmann, ON ;
Min, K ;
Boos, N ;
Ruetsch, YA ;
Erni, T ;
Curt, A .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (10) :1532-1535
[10]   Transcranial Electric Stimulation for Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring: Dependence of Required Stimulation Current on Interstimulus Interval Value [J].
Joksimovic, Boban ;
Damjanovic, Aleksandar ;
Damjanovic, Aleksandra ;
Rasulic, Lukas .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 76 (03) :190-198