A SPHERICAL FUZZY BASED DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK WITH EINSTEIN AGGREGATION FOR COMPARING PREPAREDNESS OF SMEs IN QUALITY 4.0

被引:48
作者
Biswas, Sanjib [1 ]
Bozanic, Darko [2 ,8 ]
Pamu, Dragan [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Marinkovic, Dragan [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Calcutta Business Sch, Decis Sci & Operat Management Area, Diamond Harbour Rd, Bishnupur 743503, West Bengal, India
[2] Univ Def Belgrade, Mil Acad, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Belgrade, Fac Org Sci, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] Yuan Ze Univ, Coll Engn, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
[5] Lebanese Amer Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Math, Byblos, Lebanon
[6] Univ Nis, Fac Mech Engn, Nish, Serbia
[7] TU Berlin, Dept Struct Anal, Berlin, Germany
[8] Univ Def Belgrade, Mil Acad, Veljka Luk Kurjaka 33, Belgrade 11040, Serbia
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Spherical Fuzzy Sets (SFS); Einstein aggregation; Simple Ranking Process (SRP); Symmetry Point of Criterion (SPC); SETS; IMPLEMENTATION; RECOGNITION; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.22190/FUME230831037B
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Researchers work hard to embrace technological changes and redefine the quality management as Quality 4.0 (Q 4.0). In this context, the purpose of the current work is twofold. First, it aims to compare the preparedness of the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) for sustaining in Q4. Second, it intends to propose a novel hybrid spherical fuzzy based multi-criteria group decision-making (MAGDM) framework with Einstein aggregation (EA). A real-life case study on six SMEs is carried out with the help of three experts. For aggregating the individual responses (using spherical fuzzy numbers or SFNs), EA is used. Then two very recent models such as Simple Ranking Process (SRP) and Symmetry Point of Criterion (SPC) are extended using SFN to rank the SMEs. Finally, the validation tests and sensitivity analysis are carried out. It is noted that the application of analytical tools, knowledge management and use of technology under the support and mentorship of visionary leadership are the key criteria for building up the capability to embrace Q 4.0. Interestingly, it is noted that medium scale firms are better prepared than small-scale enterprises. This work is apparently a first of its kind that focuses on SMEs for assessing their quality management practices in Industry 4.0 era.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 478
页数:26
相关论文
共 105 条
[2]  
Ali Kashif, 2022, Proceedings of International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems: ICETIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (299), P608, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-82616-1_50
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IBEF Report
[4]  
Arts Humanities & Social Sciences Motherwood University Roorkee India, 2022, Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, V2, P53, DOI [10.31181/jdaic10016062022v, 10.31181/jdaic10016062022v, DOI 10.31181/JDAIC10016062022V]
[5]   Emergency decision support modeling under generalized spherical fuzzy Einstein aggregation information [J].
Ashraf, Shahzaib ;
Abdullah, Saleem ;
Chinram, Ronnason .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2022, 13 (04) :2091-2117
[6]   Child Development Influence Environmental Factors Determined Using Spherical Fuzzy Distance Measures [J].
Ashraf, Shahzaib ;
Abdullah, Saleem ;
Abdullah, Lazim .
MATHEMATICS, 2019, 7 (08)
[7]   Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems [J].
Ashraf, Shahzaib ;
Abdullah, Saleem ;
Mahmood, Tahir ;
Ghani, Fazal ;
Mahmood, Tariq .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (03) :2829-2844
[8]   INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, K ;
GARGOV, G .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 31 (03) :343-349
[9]  
Atanassov K. T., 1989, PREPRINT
[10]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96