A Workflow to Detect, Monitor, and Update Lists of Coordinated Social Media Accounts Across Time: The Case of the 2022 Italian Election

被引:3
作者
Giglietto, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
Marino, Giada [1 ]
Mincigrucci, Roberto [1 ]
Stanziano, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Urbino, Urbino, Italy
[2] Univ Urbino, Dept Commun Sci Humanities & Int Studies DISCUI, Via A Saffi 15, I-61029 Urbino, PU, Italy
来源
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY | 2023年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
information operations; coordinated inauthentic behavior; social media monitoring; problematic content detection; digital political communication; NEWS;
D O I
10.1177/20563051231196866
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Information operations that target public opinion often exploit breaking news, crises, and elections by using coordinated social media actors to disseminate problematic content. These events often reveal the relationships between actors, prompting the creation of lists of malicious actors and news sources. However, relying on outdated lists may underestimate the prevalence and impact of such operations. This article presents a novel workflow to detect, monitor, and update lists of coordinated social media actors during and beyond peak activity periods. Using this approach, known problematic actors are constantly monitored, allowing the detection of new actors and the update of the monitored pool. The workflow was applied to the 2022 Italian snap election, leveraging previous research on coordinated inauthentic behavior during the 2018 and 2019 Italian elections. The initial list of 435 coordinated accounts was monitored, surfacing 1,022 overly shared or commented political posts, 272 coordinated links, and detecting 66 political and 554 generic coordinated accounts not previously listed. Three case studies were identified: one politically motivated, one click-economy driven, and one religiously motivated operation. The article discusses the implications of this approach, its limitations, and potential future work.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew ;
Yu, Chuan .
RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2019, 6 (02)
[2]   Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :211-235
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Facebook post
[4]   The Brexit Botnet and User-Generated Hyperpartisan News [J].
Bastos, Marco T. ;
Mercea, Dan .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2019, 37 (01) :38-54
[5]  
Ben Houidi Z, 2019, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, V13, P91, DOI [10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3212, 10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3212, DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V13I01.3212]
[6]  
Benkler Y., 2019, Cautionary notes on disinformation and the origins of distrust, DOI [10.35650/md.2004.d.2019, DOI 10.35650/MD.2004.D.2019]
[7]   Coordinated inauthentic behavior and information spreading on Twitter [J].
Cinelli, Matteo ;
Cresci, Stefano ;
Quattrociocchi, Walter ;
Tesconi, Maurizio ;
Zola, Paola .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2022, 160
[8]   DNA-Inspired Online Behavioral Modeling and Its Application to Spambot Detection [J].
Cresci, Stefano ;
Di Pietro, Roberto ;
Petrocchi, Marinella ;
Spognardi, Angelo ;
Tesconi, Maurizio .
IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (05) :58-64
[9]  
Crowd Tangle Team, 2024, How do you calculate overperforming scores?
[10]   Cloaked websites: propaganda, cyber-racism and epistemology in the digital era [J].
Daniels, Jessie .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2009, 11 (05) :659-683